in this nightline interview from yesterday.
It is the first thing discussed:
http://abcnews.go.com/NightlineWhat Wall street doesn't "like" about Geithner's plan, isn't the lack of specifics,
it's the fact that they won't be able to get TARP money,
unless they submit to an asset audit and valuation process....and the banks don't want that,
because of what might be found.
What Geithner stated yesterday in his address.....
"We cannot make that mistake. We believe that access to public support is a privilege, not a right. When our government provides support to banks, it is not for the benefit of banks. It is for the businesses and families to depend on banks. And it's for the benefit of the country.
.....
Now, here's what we will do: Our work begins with a new framework of oversight in governance on all aspects of our financial stability plan. The American people will be able to see where their tax dollars are going and the return on their government's investment.
They will be able to see whether the conditions placed on banks are being met and enforced. They will be able to see whether boards of directors are being responsible with the taxpayer dollars and how they are compensating their executives. And they will be able to see how these actions are affecting the overall flow of lending and the cost of borrowing.
These new requirements, which will be available on a new Web site, financialstability.gov, will give the American people the transparency they deserve.
........
Let me describe each of these three steps. First, we're going to require banking institutions to go through a carefully designed comprehensive stress test. This borrows the medical term. We want their balance sheets cleaner and stronger, and we're going to help this process by providing a new program of capital support for those institutions that need it.
To do this, we're going to bring together the agencies with authority over our nation's banks and initiate a more consistent, realistic, forward-looking assessment about the exposures on bank balance sheets, and we're going to introduce new measures to improve disclosure. Those institutions that need additional capital will be able to access a new funding mechanism that uses capital from the Treasury as a bridge to private capital.
The capital will come with conditions to help ensure that every dollar of taxpayer assistance is being used to generate a level of lending greater than what would have been possible in the absence of government support.
And this assistance will come with terms that should encourage these institutions to replace public assistance with private capital as soon as that is possible. The Treasury's investments in these institutions will be placed in a new financial stability trust.
Now, second, we will work together with the Federal Reserve, with the FDIC, and with the private sector to establish a public-private investment fund. And this program will provide government capital and government financing to help leverage private capital to help get private markets working again. This fund will be targeted to the legacy loans and assets that are now burdening many financial institutions.
By providing the financing the private markets cannot now provide, this will help start a market for the real estate-related assets that are at the center of this financial crisis. Our objective is to use private capital and private asset managers to help provide a market mechanism for valuating -- for valuing these assets.
Now, we're exploring a range of different structures, and we'll seek input from the public as we design this program. But we believe this program should ultimately provide up to $1 trillion in financing capacity, but we plan to start it on a scale of about $500
......
Our obligation is to design these programs so that we are achieving the largest benefit in terms of supporting recovery at the least cost to the taxpayer. And we take that obligation extremely seriously. " http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/10/AR2009021001227.html