Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Patrick Fitzgerald Will Retain Job In Obama Administration

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 08:39 AM
Original message
Patrick Fitzgerald Will Retain Job In Obama Administration
From NBC's Pete Williams
Patrick Fitzgerald, the U.S. attorney in Chicago who brought criminal fraud charges against Rod Blagojevich, will be staying in his job in the Obama administration, even though he was appointed to the position by President George W. Bush.

U.S. attorneys are political appointees. The normal practice, when there's a change of political parties in the White House, is for the incoming administration to replace all 93 U.S. attorneys with appointees from the new president's party. For now, the Obama administration has asked the current Republican-appointed U.S. attorneys to remain in their posts while it considers how many to retain.

But Fitzgerald will not be asked to move on. Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois has recommended that Eric Holder, the new attorney general, keep Fitzgerald. That suggestion was "positively received," according to officials at the Justice Department and Sen. Durbin's office.

Fitzgerald has been the U.S. attorney in Chicago since 2001. His spokesman had no comment on Fitzgerald's future.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/02/10/1789466.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good. Fitzgerald does a hell of a job and deserves the position as long as he wants it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realitythink Donating Member (354 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not getting Rove or Cheney is a good job?
You could argue that he did a lousy job and used the "sand in the face" argument to let the big guys off the hook. After all, he is a republican. In retrospect the Plame case was a disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. He did the job he was appointed to do in 2003.
The CIA IG investigated Plame's outing and referred it DOJ for prosecution in September 2003. Fitz's brief was to prosecute those immediately involved, not to bring down the Presidency.

If he'd gone there, he would've been fired.

But, the public did get enough information out of the Libby Trial to know that Cheney was the center of the conspiracy, and Bush approved it. The public simply failed to push Congress to impeach, and Congressional leadership failed to take initiative.

Fitz did his job. The America system of government failed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I agree, he did his job and am glad he will continue....
with the Obama Administration. It seems some believe Fitzgerald should have ignored the very laws he is appointed to enforce in order to 'get' bush and cheney.

I would love to see Fitzgerald be appointed a special counsel with a broad mandate to investigate the crimes committed by the bush administration but, sadly, I doubt that would happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. It's not Fitz' fault that outing CIA ops isn't more clearly illegal.
The Administration used the leeway they had, and I think all Fitz had on them was the stupid cover-up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The crime was indeed structured to evade individual prosecution under the IIPA
See, Intelligence Identities Protection Act
(i) who resides and acts outside the United States as an agent of, or informant or source ... a foreign intelligence component of the Department of Defense, ...
http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/laws/iipa.html

However, involvement in the conspiracy to reveal a NOC intelligence Officer's identity was clearly a crime. Otherwise, there would have been no probable cause to investigate it or to prosecute the resulting perjury and obstruction of justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. You have no idea what a sewer Illinois politics is
There are so many crooks involved in politics here - Dems do not compete with Rs. They are the same party really. They are in bed with various business and organized crime interests. Really.

Fitz is putting these crooks in jail. See George Ryan. See Blago. He is putting an entire generation of political fixers and bagmen in jail where they belong. He is pursuing the biggest fish out there (and the biggest fish out there is not Obama, it is Daley).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. I feel that this may be a BIG mistake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC