Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate and House reportedly reach deal on stimulus with $70 billion in green spending

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-09 11:08 PM
Original message
Senate and House reportedly reach deal on stimulus with $70 billion in green spending

Senate and House reportedly reach deal on stimulus with $70 billion in green spending

Posted by Kate Sheppard at 3:17 PM on 11 Feb 2009

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) on Wednesday afternoon announced that congressional negotiators had finalized a deal on the economic stimulus package. The $789 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act contains an estimated $70 billion in funding for clean energy, energy efficiency, and public transportation, according to reports from the Hill.

Well, maybe. There still seems to be some tension with House leaders, who wanted a stronger package. Assuming the deal sticks, the bill will now have to get final approval from both the House and Senate, and then will go to President Obama's desk for his signature.

The dollar figure on green spending is exactly halfway between the House and Senate versions -- the House had approved $72 billion, the Senate $68 billion. The House's version of the bill had been the greener of the two, according to a study by the consulting firm ICF International, commissioned by Greenpeace. Obama's original stimulus proposal had been greener still.

We'll report on the green specifics of the deal as they become available.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder if the bicycle infrastucture can be expanded.,...there was an attempt
by some dickhead (R) to specifically strip pedestrian/cyclist/bridle path construction form the bill....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is a good compromise. They took the average of the two amounts.
Yes, the wrangling was over $2 billion dollars, which I feel just might make it's way as an addition to a separate Alternative Energies bill or the federal budget later this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for this! I read here earlier it was out completely by
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 01:36 AM by firedupdem
our right wing President and his right wing cabinet...I should have marked the thread. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC