Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Gregg (w/ the GOP) intentionally accept and withdraw to undermine Obama and make him look bad?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:27 PM
Original message
Did Gregg (w/ the GOP) intentionally accept and withdraw to undermine Obama and make him look bad?
I would not count it out from the GOP. It is becoming more and more apparent, the Republicans do not give a give a F about bi-partisanship or about the Obama administration.

They are all united to try to bring down Obama and undermine this country at the same time for their own political ambitions. I don't buy the BS that Gregg does not support or know enough about the Stimulus. He knew what Obama wanted out of the stimulus when he took the position.

I smell a GOP ploy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. No tin foil hat this time
Gregg didn't get to keep the census that he wanted so bad.

Plus he's got an aide that's up to his eyeballs in corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. It's time to expose that aide publicly BIG time.
And fast.

God, I hope that Rahm is on top of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. It just proves once again that their screams about bipartisanship
is nothing but pure bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. This is the most important aspect. Regardless of the differences, Obama is willing to work with the
other side of the aisle. The pukes, clearly are not.

This should get enough publicity that there will be some serious digging done to get to the bottom of it. Regardless of the real motivation, it is now crystal clear that the pukes have no desire or care for working with Obama and the Dem's. They have lost grasp on one of the few remaining frayed ends of the rope they are dangling from over the cliff of oblivion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. No
It makes him look weak as hell. (Judd-head)

He is going to lose his seat come '10.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe, but Gregg is the one who looks bad
after all he accepted the nomination long after the stimulus had been proposed and was in the works. Gregg looks like a flip flopper or someone with skeletons in his closet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Howardx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. yep
cant see how it hurts obama, he was trying to be bipartisan and they backstabbed him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:32 PM
Original message
Obama has tried time and time again.
All but a few Rethugs are cooperating in any form (Lahood, Snowe, Collins, Specter).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I agree. It just proves the Pubs don't want bipartisanship at all!
Most Americans have already seen that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
33. Absolutely. And it wreaks of something more than stimulus & census.
Goody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brianna69 Donating Member (339 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thank goodness he is gone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. If they did..they blew it. 'Cause, guess what?
It makes Obama look good and stupid look bad. "Stimulus bill" my :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
39. doesn't this remind you of McCain's rushing back to DC to "solve" the economic crisis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Oh yeah..grandstanding
stupidity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. I doubt it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
themaguffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. This makes HIM and the GOP look bad, because well, they are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. I think he saw the writing on the wall
He was taking a load of shit from the fascists -- I mean conservatives -- no, I mean fascists -- for not voting against the stimulus.

He probably started to realize that the fascists weren't going to let him be bipartisan. They were going to force his hand to be an obstructionist in the cabinet. That would be a very uncomfortable position for him to be in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cash_thatswhatiwant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. make him look bad. obama's press office didnt even know. nt
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 04:41 PM by Cash_thatswhatiwant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. No he no doubt wanted the job. But I believe its when they took the Census
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 04:43 PM by Thrill
from him he got pissed. And they probably were pissed when he would not FOR the Stimulus Bill. Its was a stupid appointment anyway. I don't know what the hell he was thinking picking him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. Obama took away his Census responsibility- I'd withdraw also- The Census is a main
function of Commerce if he can't be trusted with it he should not be Commerce Secretary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. Josh Marshall reports Gregg withdrew because he was getting too much shit from his Repug colleagues.
Late Update: Hearing maybe that this might not be about Census or Stimulus but maybe Gregg not being able to hack the deluge of crap he was getting from what's left of the New Hampshire GOP.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
34. Ohhhhh, so he's a pussy. That sounds about right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. No. Obama told him to.
Obama told him to, which is only best for all - obviously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
19. good riddance
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 04:51 PM by ErinBerin84
This was a pick that I didn't like...just wasn't right for the job. I guess Rachel was right..."Republicans...they are just not that into you."


And the media people are already being assholes about this. Gregg didn't think that maybe he wouldn't be a good match for a Democratic administration? Bad choice by Obama, but this makes Gregg look weak as hell. I bet that the reports were right, he just couldn't hack the flack. Oh well. Let's get a good one this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
20. Good riddance to Gregg
I don't care why. Even ignoring the guy's world view limitations, that sweetheart deal from the Governor on promising to appoint a Repuke was Blagojevicharific.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skeewee08 Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
21. I think it makes him and the rethugs look bad, Obama would of have 3 of them in his Cabinet
This shows Obama as trying to reach out to the other side, I am glad that he is gone, wish he would of picked a Democrat from the beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'd say, YES
Teh White House PRess office was surprised.

Gregg just pulled a fast one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. MSNBC's First Read wonders...
"Did Gregg only discover now that Obama is a Democrat?"

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/02/12/1792622.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
23. It makes GREGG look bad. . . . not the President..
He's just not up to the challenge of working FOR the American people. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
25. Judd Gregg isn't that smart.
Hell, he needs someone to find and install his battery packet every morning before he leaves the house. Unfortunately, when he's up speechifying that person is not there to remove it.

He was afraid his buddies at the club wouldn't talk to him any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
26. It is very obvious that these Republicans do not want to work with
this administration what so ever! Since it is this obvious for God's sake why would this administration keep trying to work with them? I say if we can get away with it, ignoring them is the only way to go. Of course, that is after every Democrat and the President keep telling the people that the Republicans refuse to work with them and don't seem to want to get the country back in order. After a while it will sink in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newview88 Donating Member (80 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
27. One word YES
The GOP is a despicable party of sore losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freemarketer6 Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
28. That's what I think too. However, it may reflect more on Obama
than would be normal because of the other cabinet picks that have proved unfortunate. I don't think the public will care about this too much, but I just wonder what the media will say. This starts the war in earnest though. Obama can no longer capitulate to Republicans on anything. I now fully believe Obama should not have yielded at all to Republicans on the stimulus package. He should have simply let them filibuster. I don't fully understand the census matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Please explain how Someone who lobbied for a position
backs out without heads up.

Looks to me like Gregg was given a choice by someone outside of the Obama administration, and he caved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freemarketer6 Donating Member (189 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. Yeah, FC, that's what I said-- "...That's what I think too...". Who gave
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 05:13 PM by freemarketer6
him the ultimatum and why? That will be learned, maybe today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
30. It doesn't reflect badly on Obama at all. It's the republicans
who have been exposed as hyper partisan fools,unable to see beyond their petty politics to work for the common good. Let people see them for what they really are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
31. This is exactly what is crossing my mind. They're messing with the vetting system. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
32. It doesn't make Obama look bad, it makes Gregg look bad.
He refuses to put his party politics aside for the good of the country after Obama reached out to him and offered him a cabinet post, and he accepted. Now he drops out without giving notice to the President? He looks like a huge dick.

The Stimulus excuse is bullshit because he's known about it for weeks -- before Obama was inaugurated even. And who in the hell resigns because of the census? That's the lamest shit-excuse I've ever heard.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
36. maybe--but why did O nominate him in the 1st place? this 'bipartisan' nonsense is lose-lose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
37. It is simple: Gregg is not trustworthy and not a man of his word as they say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Born_A_Truman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
38. That was my first thought!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
40. I think Gregg looks bad, not Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
41. No. I think he accepted because he thought he was going to be in charge of the census.
He thought that the Repugnants where going to get yet another crack at underestimating minority populations so that they could do a little more creative gerrymandering of the congressional districts. When they found out that Obama had out-smarted them and pulled the census out from under his control, the position no longer looked as appealing.

And now they can whine about how undemocratic the White House is because it wants to count all of the U.S. population and not just that in heavily conservative areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC