|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
TheBigotBasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 04:47 PM Original message |
Krugman for Commerce |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
1. That's a real waste of economic talent. Krugman could be on the CEA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
2. Good choice - and then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostinacause (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 09:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
19. He probably wouldn't be a good fit, not being a monetary economist and all... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 04:51 PM Response to Original message |
3. What part of 'he doesn't want a position in this admin' don't you get? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 04:51 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. HE DOES NOT WANT IT!!!! Is that good enough? LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 04:52 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Yes, that will do nicely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBigotBasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
12. Was only throwing out a name |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 04:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. That didn't stop the "Draft Gore" people here... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crimsonblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 08:27 PM Response to Reply #3 |
16. He may not want a position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 04:54 PM Response to Original message |
6. Yes the Great Paul Krugman is the answer for everything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 04:58 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Isn't that odd? He getting more and more popular...hmmm n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PVnRT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 09:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
21. Sour grapes make bad wine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JFKfanforever (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 07:05 AM Response to Reply #6 |
26. You mean Mr Paul ENRON Krugman? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
8. I could be wrong, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenTea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
10. I think Krugman, Howard Dean, Wes Clark are too liberal for Obama's views... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 06:11 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. agree, plus it's a waste of K's talent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 08:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
17. Wes Clark too liberal for Obama ????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 11:50 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Wes Clark is a moderate or am I losing my bearings? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 07:29 AM Response to Reply #17 |
27. Look at the policy positions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
11. Commerce is a LOUSY job. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
13. Why not Robert Reich? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
15. Krugman SHOULD have been Sec of Treasury |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MarjorieG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
18. Commerce goes global breaking barriers for business. Sound like Krugman? Not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
20. He should of just hired John Thompson like it was rumored. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
23. Commerce is probably the worst place imaginable to put him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 11:52 PM Response to Original message |
24. you mean the guy who's been bashing Obama the past month? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheBigotBasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 08:00 AM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Bashing Obama and the Democratic Senate for not going for enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HOLOS (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 11:56 PM Response to Original message |
25. Robert Reich would know the job v.v. well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 08:12 AM Response to Original message |
29. Why? As long as Harry Reid lets McConnell run the Senate, nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:03 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC