|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:15 PM Original message |
Is Rahm inept or just bad at his job? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMDemDist2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. it wasn't a vetting issue, it was a spineless lying Repuke being a turncoat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:23 PM Response to Reply #1 |
16. that would be a vetting issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:27 PM Response to Reply #16 |
23. Yes it is really too bad that Rahm can't see the future |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redstate_democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 07:53 PM Response to Reply #23 |
57. I would suggest that he should be able to see the future. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 11:35 PM Response to Reply #57 |
61. Yeah, it seems like it wouldn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine1967 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 06:03 PM Response to Reply #16 |
39. No, it would be a lying issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
2. WTF? What does this have to do with Rahm? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:18 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. As chief of staff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:24 PM Response to Reply #9 |
18. Richardson and Daschle had different issues and reasons for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:27 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. two cases in point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 11:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
60. Did anyone really expect that reactionary to carry out the wishes of Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Window (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
37. Not a damned thing. Some people just say shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 06:20 PM Response to Reply #37 |
43. LOL!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 10:24 AM Response to Reply #2 |
69. Well, you see, according to some folks here, Rahm Emanuel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
3. Rahm isn't the president. I don't know why people forget that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:24 PM Response to Reply #3 |
19. Oh snap, you're right, he's Chief of Staff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Parker CA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
4. You should go work for MSNBC. They are all spouting the same meme. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:23 PM Response to Reply #4 |
15. One of many failed picks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 06:06 PM Response to Reply #15 |
41. He caved to the REPUGS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 07:49 PM Response to Reply #41 |
56. thank you for doing your part to making sure if he runs he loses! and, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
certainot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 06:33 AM Response to Reply #15 |
66. it's a GOP talking point limbaugh and hannity have been barfing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
5. Dude, Rahm is the one who wisely took the Census away from Gregg. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. Rahm obviously didn't trust Gregg |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Rahm is not at the top of the food chain. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:24 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. one step down |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:27 PM Original message |
Okay, then who should Rahm nominate for Commerce Secretary now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
25. 1. Commerce: a Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:36 PM Original message |
I noticed you didn't give the NAME of who RAHM should nominate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
34. yeah - I'm not Chief of Staff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:41 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. no, and you obviously don't know TWO important things: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 11:23 AM Response to Reply #17 |
70. So Rahm is more responsible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. Bogeyman Rahm is responsible for everything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:20 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Yep! He keyed my car, told the dog crap on the rug, and squeezed the toothpaste from the top. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:20 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. That makes me like him even more...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:21 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Er, um what are the responsibilities of Chief of Staff? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:27 PM Response to Reply #13 |
22. To select, vet and nominate every single one of Obamas appointments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pink-o (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
24. Under my bed? Promise??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:31 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. okay.....I wouldn't want to be rude either.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pink-o (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:38 PM Response to Reply #28 |
33. So it's agreed...maybe the two of us could take Amy on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:45 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. LOL!! I'm skeeered of Amy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pink-o (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 06:34 PM Response to Reply #36 |
46. That's probably for the best. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 07:39 PM Response to Reply #46 |
54. I'm finding that anything that may be slighly negative is all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
8. It might be they were testing out that bipartisan stuff gently. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:26 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. Ok - but that makes me even more nuts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:33 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. They pushed the "we're all americans" thing really hard. They were obliged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 11:25 AM Response to Reply #20 |
71. If you think it's Rahm that's pushing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 11:31 AM Response to Reply #71 |
73. Rahm is the least bipartisan of the bunch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:00 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. You know that, I know that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
26. WTF ?! When did you stop beating your wife/husband/pets/kids? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
27. Neither. Rahm doesn't have a crystal ball to tell him when someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Numba6 (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
30. You've gotta be kidding... how can any thinking person make these judgements 1 month into Obama's te |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
31. Are you a comedian or really uninformed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
32. How are you blaming Rahm? I don't get it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
camera obscura (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
38. for people questioning -- Gregg was Emanuel and Reid's idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 06:45 PM Response to Reply #38 |
50. You're still quoting Politico. Tsk, tsk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TeamJordan23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
40. I wouldn't blame him for everything but he has been sloppy no doubt. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 06:08 PM Response to Original message |
42. he's right of center |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 06:22 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. no he isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 06:40 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. well.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 06:49 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 11:27 PM Response to Reply #51 |
59. spoken like a true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 05:46 AM Response to Reply #59 |
64. Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4lbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 06:53 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. They lie with President Obama since Barack and Rahm have been good friends since Obama's days |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annabanana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 06:27 PM Response to Original message |
45. maybe Rahm KNEW he has an Abramoff problem and would have to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
48. Gregg is DONE. Hear hear Rahm!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
49. so apparently for some here at DU, Rahm is the new Rove |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftynyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 11:27 AM Response to Reply #49 |
72. Excellent comparison |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
53. I dunno but I bet that Howard Dean pays his taxes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RetroLounge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
55. Thank for your concern |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalsince1968 (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 08:21 PM Response to Original message |
58. I put the blame squarely on Obama for this lousy choice. He believes in bipartisanship. I don't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 11:41 PM Response to Original message |
62. A cos can approve a nomination to go forward but at the end of the day it was Obama's decision |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-12-09 11:44 PM Response to Original message |
63. Neither. This isn't Rahm's territory. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Teaser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 06:07 AM Response to Original message |
65. So much yapping |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 07:03 AM Response to Original message |
67. I've been negligent in keeping up with the latest DU news, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaydeeBug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 07:28 AM Response to Original message |
68. Obama. Picked. Him. FIRST. So....nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
75. Then, I guess Joe Biden should accept some of the blame. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William769 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Feb-13-09 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
76. If Rahm is "inept or just bad at his job?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:59 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC