Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Your immediate reaction to Gregg's withdrawal.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:11 PM
Original message
Poll question: Your immediate reaction to Gregg's withdrawal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Favorable. He was a lousy pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good riddance to bad Repuke rubbish
This guy wanted to abolish the fucking Dept of Commerce, for fucks sake! It's almost as bad as putting John Bolton (and the caterpillar that lives on his face) at the UN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camera obscura Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm the sole "unfavorable" as of now - I'm glad he's gone but I thought "here we go again"
"... more drama for the Obama team that they really don't deserve." Sure, I hope he gets replaced by someone halfway decent, but I'm still bracing for the right wing media onslaught of half-truths and attacks on the administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Good riddance!!!" Then I got pissed.
The manner in which he withdrew was totally fucking classless (and I should know, LOL).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Goodie.... I didn't want him foot dragging over nor messing with the census
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. He should never have been offered the spot in the first place.
Now let's put someone in there who is on our side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Favorable
I could see the tactical advantage to getting him out of his Senate seat, but that went out the window when he finagled that deal to get a replacement of the same party. There's now an opportunity to get somebody in there who realizes the value of being on Obama's team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. Screw him ...
The GOP expects the dems to roll-over ... so good bye Judd.

Now we go far left for this slot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm devastated.
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 08:38 PM by rocktivity
:woohoo:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. self deleted
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 08:44 PM by TheCowsCameHome
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. likewise
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 08:45 PM by TheCowsCameHome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. DISGUST
that he's such a shameless ass who tried to ruin Obama's day. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. Other: Godsend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
14. Good riddance to bad rubbish
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
15. Thank goodness. Now we can put a Democrat in the position.
Obama can say he tried, but the Republicans obviously feel like Rush does... they hope our President fails. Consequently, they are also saying they hope our country fails as well. It's good that this Gregg withdrawal makes crystal clear the Republican vitriol and "hope" for our nation's failure.

It is time for the Democrats and the President to exercise the power given to them by the people to improve our conditions. F*ck the Republicans. This is war and it's time to render them obsolete. Either they can help us or they can be ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. One less fox in the hen house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blaze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. Buh bye! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. Favorable, but now I am worried about who Obama will replace him with. Newt Gingridge perhaps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Who's Newt Gingridge?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
19. Ecstatic. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
20. More than "favorable"..I was like
Whoopee:bounce:

"Judd Gregg: Erratic, Yet Also Oh-So-Predictable"

<Snips>

"Judd Gregg last week"

I have recused myself from voting during the pendency of my nomination," Gregg, a New Hampshire Republican, told CNBC.

Earlier in the program he said he was "not really engaged in the stimulus bill," but that he did believe "we need one."

"We need a robust one," he added. "I think the one that's pending is in the range we need. I do believe it's a good idea to do it at two levels, which this bill basically does, which is immediate stimulus and long-term initiatives which actually improve our competitiveness and our productivity."

Got that? Judd Gregg publicly supporting the administration, the need for the stimulus bill, and that stimulus bill as the right solution for the economic problems facing the country.

CNN a little while ago:

A Democratic source close to the Obama White House said Thursday that Judd Gregg "campaigned for the job" — that the New Hampshire senator had asked Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to approach the president about the Commerce post.

Gregg "sat with , said he wanted the job, knew his policies and erratically dropped out without warning," said the source, minutes after the Republican senator announced his withdrawal from consideration.

Gregg sought out the administration, pitched himself for the position, and then lobbied for it.

Judd Gregg today:

it has become apparent during this process that this will not work for me as I have found that on issues such as the stimulus package and the Census there are irresolvable conflicts for me.

And on the record, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs:"

<more>
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/2/12/173717/863/901/696763
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
22. Other
Don't give a flying fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
23. Fuck him
He probably didn't want to do want President Obama asked of him. He can crawl back under his rock with the rest of the repuke slime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
24. Favorable. Never thought that much of ol' Judd to begin with
and he bungled the blazes out of this nomination, almost from the start.

The not-voting-for-the-stimulus capped it for a lot of his constituents.

He comes off looking like a manipulative weasel.

Which is to state the obvious.

And not least, the appointment can now go to someone with a lot more on the ball.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC