Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nouriel Roubini: Nationalizing the Banks Can End The Death Spiral We Are In

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 03:56 PM
Original message
Nouriel Roubini: Nationalizing the Banks Can End The Death Spiral We Are In

Nationalize the Banks! We're all Swedes Now
By Matthew Richardson and Nouriel Roubini
Washington Post
Sunday, February 15, 2009

Matthew Richardson and Nouriel Roubini, professors at New York University's Stern School of Business, both contributed to the upcoming book "Restoring Financial Stability: How to Repair a Failed System."

-----------------------------

The U.S. banking system is close to being insolvent, and unless we want to become like Japan in the 1990s -- or the United States in the 1930s -- the only way to save it is nationalization. As free-market economists teaching at a business school in the heart of the world's financial capital, we feel downright blasphemous proposing an all-out government takeover of the banking system. But the U.S. financial system has reached such a dangerous tipping point that little choice remains. And while Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner's recent plan to save it has many of the right elements, it's basically too late.

The subprime mortgage mess alone does not force our hand; the $1.2 trillion it involves is just the beginning of the problem. Another $7 trillion -- including commercial real estate loans, consumer credit-card debt and high-yield bonds and leveraged loans -- is at risk of losing much of its value. Then there are trillions more in high-grade corporate bonds and loans and jumbo prime mortgages, whose worth will also drop precipitously as the recession deepens and more firms and households default on their loans and mortgages.

Nationalization is the only option that would permit us to solve the problem of toxic assets in an orderly fashion and allow lending finally to resume. Of course, the economy would still stink, but the death spiral we are in would stop.

The eventual outcome would be a healthy financial system with many new banks capitalized by good assets. Insolvent, too-big-to-fail banks would be broken up into smaller pieces less likely to threaten the whole financial system. Regulatory reforms also would be instituted to reduce the chances of costly future crises.

Nationalizing banks is not without precedent. In 1992, the Swedish government took over its insolvent banks, cleaned them up and reprivatized them. Obviously, the Swedish banking system was much smaller than the U.S. system. Moreover, some of the current U.S. financial institutions are much larger and more complex, making analysis difficult. And today's global capital markets make gaming the system easier than in 1992. But we believe that, if applied correctly, the Swedish solution will work here.

Basically, we're all Swedes now. We have used all our bullets, and the boogeyman is still coming. Let's pull out the bazooka and be done with it.

Please read the entire article at:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/12/AR2009021201602.html?sid=ST2009021203365&s_pos&s_pos=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. The 21st Century Cassandra.
No, nationalization will not be pretty. Chemotherapy never is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The alternative to nationalization is a full scale 1930's type depression
So that makes the choice very clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Yeap, the banks in the 30's COULDN'T put money bank in circulation cause the didn't have any
...people shoved it under their matress's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Perhaps if we ignore the alarmist message everything will be all right!

We standing on the edge of the cliff right now. And it appears the some of us have blinders on. If exactly the right moves are not made, such as nationalizing the banks, we will certainly descend into a world-wide economic crisis that could be just as bad or even worse than the 1930's depression.

And we have posters gleefully writing that the Republicans are sunk as a political party while the Democratic Party will certainly pick up a lot more seats in Congress in 2010 and 2012! Not if the economy is in the toilet! What are they smoking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. YEAP, the US banks are lead by bastards and the Swedes did it the RIGHT way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. It worked for Sweden but they only had 10 banks.
We have more than 100 times that many. I don't see how, practically, we can nationalize that many banks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Don't have to, nationalize the big boys and force them to take their refi and new home rates down to
...3% and sell the blocks of money to them at same margin the were getting in 06.

Instant pick up of economy, there's no one in their right mind who wouldn't refi or buy for that rate if it was kept open for 3 months.

THEN, the other smaller banks would have to follow suite buying blocks of cash from the feds at the same rate the big boys did if they wanted to compete.

Pick the rates up when house prices stop the free fall...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. That's certainly feasible.
Have you sent this to the Obama Admin? I'm serious - I like your idea. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. You're right. I hope the writer also send it to Nouriel Roubini .....
in fact the author can post their comments on Roubini's RGE website right underneath this specific article!

http://www.rgemonitor.com/roubini-monitor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Read the article and you will understand. The major insolvent banks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. That and single payer health care.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'm on board
So is Stiglitz. Just move quickly. There is no time for obstructionism from the idiotic GOP, nor from the worthless blue dogs. We have to get busy on this. Let the banks who can't cut it fail and shave the rest. Set up a national bank to handle meat and potatoes lending to regular people and look toward selling off those parts of the banking industry that may have value in the future. It's not too late to act, but the window is closing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Good. Now we need to get President Obama on board and those around him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I think that's going to take at least a few months.
Think of some of his team members. Like Treasury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
14. Capitalism is dying ...
the only question left is the human species determined to die with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
15. Cenk Uygur: "Just nationalize the damn banks already"

Who Keeps Screwing Us Over?
by Cenk Uygur
Feb 12, 2009

We're wasting our time here. Just nationalize the damn banks already. Almost all of the top economists are now in agreement that we should take this step. The people who put the money in are the people who own the company - that's how capitalism works. I'm a die-hard capitalist. I don't want the federal government owning banks for an extended period of time. But what's worse is to continue letting these bankers rob us of our money day in and day out while we sit around like fools.

We buy it, we own it. Kick the clowns out. Run it for a limited amount of time while we stabilize the credit markets. And then sell them off in the free market. Instead of begging the bankers to loosen up credit, we take the banks and do it ourselves.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/2/12/14424/0375/1023/696657
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pa28 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. It's about taking control of the situation.
Edited on Sat Feb-14-09 04:32 PM by pa28
Propping up the major banks and institutions from the outside strikes me as a weak strategy. The leveraged losses accelerate while the money goes out and the goalposts move again as we helplessly watch billions evaporate, likely forever(see AIG).

There's too much at stake to cross our fingers and hope the large institutions will stop the losses, rethink their philosophies and pay the money back. Yes, shareholders will be hurt by nationalization and some form of derivatives freeze or nationalized derivatives settlement will hurt many more. It's unfortunate for them(and us)but maybe necessary and at least we'll have the groundwork for a turnaround.

Nationalization seems like breaking a social taboo but it's the strong response to a critical situation and it also gives us a fighting chance to put a floor on the losses. I want the government to remain financially solvent and I don't want to see the treasury flushed into a cycle of never ending and expanding losses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
19. I agree. It sucks but it has to be done. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC