Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama should offer that those who voted against Stimulus don't need to get the money

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:19 PM
Original message
Obama should offer that those who voted against Stimulus don't need to get the money
Since it is apparent that those who voted against the Stimulus package are hell-bent on trying to act like they disagree with the package, perhaps these people should willingly come forward and demand that their constituents, districts or states should get NOTHING.

It's time to actually see who would stand up for their principles and who will take the money even though they voted against the legislation. Why not?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ComtesseDeSpair Donating Member (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. The people in red states...
are just lucky that their President cares about them, whether or not they care about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. I thought Clyburn put a use it or lose it provision in the bill to do just that
Correct me if I am wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Governors have 45 days to accept or decline stimulus funds
But I don't know if it was in the final bill. Anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_Horrible Donating Member (173 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. pretty sure - it wasn't cut in the conference session... haven't seen the final to confirm though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_Horrible Donating Member (173 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. he did...
there are blue voters in red states - don't screw us over because we're outnumbered!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Eff 'em. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Except for the fact that I shouldn't be punished because ....
.... my reps FAILED to do what I BEGGED them to.

I really do enjoy drinking water .... and that's one of the things the bill will help Tennessean's with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. it would be funny yet sad to see their constituents lose out
these guys had no trouble funding the dumb Iraq war!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daninthemoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. Absolutely. Any future stimuls type bills should certainly include a
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 11:30 PM by daninthemoon
clause that any congressman who votes against it will receive no benefit to their constituents. It's a matter of principle for them right? Government spending is evil and the only answer is tax reductions? Terrific, then let's put their money where their mouths are, and let their constituents feel the brunt. Congressmen who vote for infrastructure get infrastructure funding. Congressmen who vote against it get none. Surely some private sector entity will build their roads and bridges right? Give these neocon assholes exactly what they are asking for from their high horses. Government is bad, so let's demand that government leaves their constituents alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. Spending money on US infrastructure, BAD! Spending money in Iraq, GOOD!
Repuke policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. Well, remember in a state like Arizona, where both Senators and all the House Reps voted NO,
There is still 45% of the state population that voted for Obama.

They shouldn't be penalized because of the actions of their stupid Congresspeople. I'm sure most of that 45% didn't vote for them either.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. "Thank you senator Boner for speaking out about pork."
In your state (since that's the only one with which you are familiar) which projects constitute pork?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. They'd just demand tax cuts
It's never as simple as it ought to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC