|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Soupy Liberaltarian (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 06:10 AM Original message |
Is the GOP a necessary evil for a stable U.S. government? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PretzelWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 06:13 AM Response to Original message |
1. no. their demise could usher in a true multiparty system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salguine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 09:39 AM Response to Reply #1 |
14. The Democrats are as aggressive in their efforts to suppress third parties as the Republicans are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 06:56 AM Response to Original message |
2. They are less than worthless now, and I expect they will only get worse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 07:07 AM Response to Original message |
3. Only if you're a Manichean. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dcindian (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 07:48 AM Response to Original message |
4. No not any more so then is Al-Qeada needed for world peace. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RagAss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 07:50 AM Response to Original message |
5. They've got the "evil" part down pat.....Necessary?,,,No way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PretzelWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 07:52 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. ok. some of you are being dipsh!ts about this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 09:01 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. The question is 'is the GOP necessary' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheCowsCameHome (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
7. "Evil" sums it up nicely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr. Sparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
8. no, the country needs a good strong decent republican party and not the extremists they are today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 09:05 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Even if the country 'needs' A Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr. Sparkle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 09:20 AM Response to Reply #10 |
11. True, but i don't see many other dancers on the dance floor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShadowLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
12. We've had much more powerless minority parties in the past |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Danger Mouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
13. Not really. The GOP's death would be good for the country. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
15. Are ticks and leeches really necessary to the ecosystem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
16. No, they are becoming the extreme right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
17. Unless we somehow move to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
18. Not sure, are genital warts a necessary evil for good health? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
19. No, but two parties are pretty much a given in our system. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malletgirl02 (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
20. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
21. Nope...not at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cooolandrew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
22. Let the Blue dogs go be the opposing party and I think I could live with that dynamic tension a> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-14-09 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
23. Yin-Yang |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 13th 2025, 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC