Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ha! Dems Pull a Fast One on Stimulus Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:04 PM
Original message
Ha! Dems Pull a Fast One on Stimulus Bill
Stimulus Plan Places New Limits on Wall St. Bonuses

A provision buried deep inside the $787 billion economic stimulus bill would impose restrictions on executive bonuses at financial institutions that are much tougher than those proposed 10 days ago by the Treasury Department.

The provision, inserted by Senate Democrats over the objections of the Obama administration, is aimed at companies that have received financial bailout funds. It would prohibit cash bonuses and almost all other incentive compensation for the five most senior officers and the 20 highest-paid executives at large companies that receive money under the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP.

The stimulus package was approved by the House on Friday, then by the Senate in the late evening.


http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/14/business/economy/14pay.html?hp

Suck on that, Pugs. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nice move! I'll bet the fucks that voted Nay knew about it...
Despite the rant that "nobody read it" you know damn well they knew some of the details...

Recommended!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Very Good! One Question...
I thought the administration wanted the caps on salary? Who had objections?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The administration did want the caps, I think it was Geunther that objected
Correct me if I am wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. oh! maybe you're right...I knew I heard the Prez say he wanted caps. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yep. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Super! They are going to learn that Obama is going to do what he said.
Gee, I wonder why they didn't find that? Boehner spent more time dropping the Bill on the floor to see if it would make a loud sound for the cameras. He should have sat down and leafed through it.

Someone needs to tell him he should hit the lamps again, his tan is fading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bear425 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. k/r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. I would like to have seen a contingency (I hope there is one already)....
...that all caps and limits imposed would be removed once the money is paid back - with interest - and steps have been taken by those companies to prevent these disasters from happening again.

Placing permanent caps on salaries is not a good idea because it would discourage talented applicants and that would cause an imbalance between similar companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Since when is talent related to bonuses and obscene extravagance?
Edited on Sat Feb-14-09 12:58 PM by lunatica
Barney Frank asked them what part of their job would they not do if they didn't get a bonus. Would they not show up for work? Would they refuse to sign 10% of the paperwork in front of them? They universally answered that there wasn't any part they wouldn't do.

And as for talent, what talent? Did they keep their business practices from bankrupting the country? Did they save jobs? Or does running a company and a whole industry into the ground a talent? In that case Bush is one talented MFer!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I am more interested in an incentive for them to pay back the loans - with interest.
And if there are no talented - read experienced - managers in any company, economic disasters like these will happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. But the incentives they got didn't work! That's my point
They're not talented. Talent is there and there's no need to pay it obscene salaries and bonuses. Talent is talent and it's just as good if they're paid 200,000 or 200,000,000. If salaries are capped do you really think they'll all go sulk and refuse to work?

More money does not equals more talent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. You are missing my point. The "talent" will shop around and go where there are bonuses and....
...little or no government control.

Not every business or bank is in trouble. Those who have not accepted bailout money, don't have to abide by any restrictions. Result? Big bonuses and all the rest of the percs.

The "talent" will shop around. I am sure they already are doing so.

Now if full blown regulation of financial institutions comes back, well that will be a whole new ball game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. I can live without those supposedly "talented" people.
Nevertheless, I would support your proposal, only because I don't believe that "we the people" will ever get paid back.

The United States is a LIBERAL Country.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
.... callchet .... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. Super confused.
Edited on Sat Feb-14-09 12:34 PM by .... callchet ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. It was a last minute insertion by Christopher Dodd.
He snuck it in right under their noses.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Well bless his little peapickin' heart. But he can only get away w/that once.
Next time, the Pubics won't trust him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Salary caps out. Bonus caps in.
That's my understanding, at least.

This OP is about the bonus caps.

The United States is a LIBERAL Country.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. Schwing!!!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
19. Hidden? Obama himself talked about it last week
Sounds like the Repubs let it pass and now are playing "Oh whoa is poor me!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC