Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This is rich. Cathy McMorris (R) voted 'no', but says stimulus has benefits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 03:11 PM
Original message
This is rich. Cathy McMorris (R) voted 'no', but says stimulus has benefits
McMorris is the 5th ranking Republican in the House, I believe. She is in their leadership team and often is picture behind Boehner. She represents the eastern portion of Washington State. She is young, attractive, just gave birth to a Down's Syndrom baby, articulate and more experienced than Sarah Palin without any of the baggage. McMorris would have been our worst nightmare if McCain had chosen her at his V.P. candidate.

http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2009/feb/20/mcmorris-rodgers-stimulus/


McMorris Rodgers says stimulus has benefits for state
Jim Camden
The Spokesman-Review

Although she voted against the federal stimulus package last week and still disagrees with many things in it, Cathy McMorris Rodgers said she wouldn’t tell governors to refuse money from the bill designed to boost the economy.

<snip>

“It would be very difficult to say no to money from the federal government,” she said Friday in an interview with The Spokesman-Review. “I understand why they are excited to have that money.”

When the House passed the $790 billion stimulus bill last week, McMorris Rodgers called it a big disappointment and a “big spending piece of legislation that does nothing to create jobs.”

Friday she amended that, saying it didn’t do enough to create jobs or address the problems with the housing market. It does have about $500 million in road and bridge projects for Washington state, which she said was a wise investment but too small a part of the bill. There is also money for more cleanup at Hanford and expansion of the Bonneville Power Administrations electric grid, which will translate into jobs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hypocrisy be damned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AyanRand Is Dead Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. LOL! She smells the money and can't help herself.
It's so very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Isn't it funny...
How they can be SO against things...

And suddenly when they're faced with how much real good can come out of that money, they change their tune?

Can you spell hypocrite?

I sure can.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. A friend at work yesteday was talking
about someone she heard on the radio who said bush a stimulus bill that was bigger than this and no one said shit.

I find that hard to believe that it was "bigger".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's pretty clear the GOP folks are taking two approaches
The ones that have designs on running for President in 2012, as well as those that think they may have a primary challenge in 2010, are standing firm in total opposition to the Recovery Act as a means of getting their republican bona fides on the record.

The rest are taking the "...well I supported some things in the bill, but couldn't bring myself to vote for the total package because it was way too costly and had pork in it..." approach. They are hedging their bets in an effort to look "reasonable" and minimize their susceptibility to the "obstructionist" charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. "...often is pictured behind Boehner" - hehe
I hear that some people make a good living when they're pictured behind Boehner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. She is joined by 22 other Republican congresscritters. Story here:
At Least 22 Lawmakers Have Touted The Money From The Recovery Package They Voted Against»

On Wednesday, ThinkProgress pointed out that several Republican lawmakers who voted against President Obama’s economic recovery package are now touting its benefits to their constituents. The New York Times picked up on the phenomena yesterday, writing that “the temptation to take credit for at least a few of those billions” has proved “irresistible” to the anti-stimulus lawmakers.


http://thinkprogress.org/2009/02/21/lawmakers-bragging-recovery/

http://thinkprogress.org/touting-recovery-opposed/

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. She'll be remembered for voting NO along with the other REPtiles
Nobody will remember her statements of Feb. 20th.

Let's hope her constituents take note of her hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Agent William Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. McMorris is not articulate
My father ran against her in 1996... her previous job experience is working at McDonald's. It makes me sick that my family and my self have watched her rise to fame, and every step of the way bigger powers at work have been advancing her. She's weak and stupid and she does what she's told by leadership, which means she's a republicans wet dream.

TAKE NOTE: she will become very popular in republicans ranks in years to come.

ALSO: She touts her "American heritage" but let her fool you. She spent most of here life in Canada attending a Christian Taliban school, and she came back worked at Mickie D's for a couple of years and then inherited a seat from Bob Sump, who at the time was up grading to state senator.

PLEASE, DIANE R, DON'T THINK OF MCMORRIS AS BRIGHT OR ARTICULATE, everything is scripted or spoon feed to her. She's easily confused and can be tricked with questions that are worded differently. If that fails just ask her about her child hood in Canada.

I feel like I'm the only one who knows this... but the truth is that the truth is on Google.

Palin junior indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. She's dumber than a box of hair
:puke:

Peter Goldmark gave her a pretty good run for her (Tom Delay's) money in 2006, but alas the pinhead pulled it off. I honestly didn't trust the results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Agent William Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. i rember that too,.
Goldmark tried, and what made me die a little inside was the fact that Goldmark was born and raised in Eastern Washington. If the Goldmark campaign would have brought up the fact that she spent much of her time in BC... well I guess I can still dream.

I know in my heart that that if McMorris's father had slunk back into the US in for instance Idaho were she could have easily been installed as senator, it would have been McCain/McMorris in 2008. I think we both know that if McCain had won she would have been but in charge of some cabinet level position and later ran for national office.

Which is another reason that I'm eternally grateful that Barack won....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. I think this is why she is dangerous. She is the perfect package, and the Cowles love her.
If you are from this area, you know that the Cowles family (whose mother is married to the publisher of the New York Times) completey controls everything and everyone in this area. They hand pick politicians, and decides who will be elected and who will fail. It's one of the most corrupt areas in the country.

They love Cathy. Cathy is a Republic Barbie doll. She has apple pink cheeks, porcelain skin, and perfect smile.

I'm glad that you agree with me that she is Palin, Jr., only more dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Agent William Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Oh no the Cowles gang...
I know how they are and it makes me sick how much power they have in the region. My father ran against Nethercutt and found out all to well about the power that the Cowles have. I remember when McMorris ran to fill Nethercutts seat when he went to go impale himself on Patty Murray. I couldn't believe that McMorris actually made it the general election, she dispatched three worthy and competent primary opponents. Yeah someone is advancing her behind the curtain, and god help us if she's ever on the national stage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VPStoltz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
10. We do have so nutcases here in the "other" Washington.
The Republicans have to be two faced because need those two mouths to talk out of.
Let me get this correct: the bill she voted against because it costs too much will be sending $ to her district that she can't turn down but complains because there isn't enough $ in the part of the bill giving her the money.
Help me here - is this woman nuts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
13. "does nothing to create jobs.” The republic party truly knows nothing whatsoever
about economics.

That, of course, is why we're in such a deep shit hole, thanks to years of the republic party's "economics".

A first-term first-year economics student knows this republic party meme of "does nothing to create jobs.” is absolutely 100% totally completely and utterly wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
14. So the part that "creates no jobs" would be the Republican tax cuts?
Their talking points are really going to get them into trouble one day - the press releases are almost reporting the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC