Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's Budget Plan To Slash Deficit By Raising Taxes on Businesses & Wealthy And Lowering War $$$

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 04:25 PM
Original message
Obama's Budget Plan To Slash Deficit By Raising Taxes on Businesses & Wealthy And Lowering War $$$
Edited on Sat Feb-21-09 05:00 PM by ClarkUSA
Barack's first budget plan's ways for halving the deficit in four years is a liberal/progressive's dream. Rush Limbaugh and his slavish followers in Congress will be screaming like stuck pigs very soon. Again. Heh.

President Obama is putting the finishing touches on an ambitious first budget that seeks to cut the federal deficit in half over the next four years, primarily by raising taxes on business and the wealthy and by slashing spending on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, administration officials said...Obama proposes to cut spending and raise taxes. The savings would come primarily from "winding down the war" in Iraq, a senior administration official said... Obama also seeks to increase tax collections, primarily by making good on his promise to eliminate the temporary tax cuts enacted in 2001 and 2003 for wealthy taxpayers, whom Obama defined during the campaign as those earning more than $250,000 a year. Those tax breaks would be permitted to expire on schedule for the 2011 tax year, when the top tax rate would rise from 35 percent to more than 39 percent.

Obama also proposes to maintain the tax on estates worth more than $3.5 million, instead of letting it expire next year. And he proposes "a fairly aggressive effort on tax enforcement" that would target tax havens and corporate loopholes
, among other provisions, the official said.

Overall, tax collections under the plan would rise from about 16 percent of the economy this year to 19 percent in 2013, while federal spending would drop from about 26 percent of the economy, another post-war high, to 22 percent.... Republicans, who are already painting Obama as a profligate spender, are laying plans to attack him on taxes as well. Even some non-partisan observers question the wisdom of announcing a plan to raise taxes in the midst of a recession. But senior White House adviser David Axelrod said in an interview that the tax proposals reflect the ideas that won the election last fall.

"This is consistent with what the president talked about throughout the campaign," and "restores some balance to the tax code in a way that protects the middle class," Axelrod said. "Most Americans will come out very well here."



:kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's what I voted for.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. You're right about exploding heads. This sounds great! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Now this is fiscal responsibility I can believe in!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. They already had the jihad out on day one
so how much more can stuck pigs squeal? My apologies to pigs who are actually smarter than the fascist squealers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'd hope to see beefed up funding for the IRS
My understanding is that the ability of the IRS to go after wealthy tax cheats has been reduced dramatically and very deliberately in recent years -- fueled in part by scare stories about a few carefully-chosen cases of the IRS unfairly targeting ordinary citizens.

More auditors and more scrutiny of questionable returns in the upper brackets would do a lot to restore both fairness and receipts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Cautiously optimistic here; worried about slashes to "entitlements" spending and the direction of
Edited on Sat Feb-21-09 04:59 PM by Runcible Spoon
healtcare. Article is prettty Freeperish: "Obama faces the long-term challenge of retirement and health programs that threaten to bankrupt the government years down the road". Ahh the good ole SS is going bankrupt meme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I have heard Obama say that ..
Social Security is not the problem, it is Medicaid that can not be sustained...and the nexus of it all is health insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'll believe it when I see it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. NYTIMES has it too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'll take that TWICE . . . !!! As I recall however. . ..
the GOP did something which moved increasing taxes on wealthy into "Supermajority" votes?

Like you need 2/3rds to pass????

Anyone remember this -- hope I'm wrong...???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. He won't actually be raising them, rather, letting them expire in 2011. n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. 2011 . . . ????
We not only need to recind those tax cuts right now ---

we need to go back to the rates of the 1950's . .. !!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks Obama, I'm glad I voted for you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hellataz Donating Member (804 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. he has yet to fail to live up to my expectations and i don't expect him to.
I don't know if one man can completly repair all the damage to this country, but he is off to a great start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmilyAnne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
14. Raising taxes or letting the Bush tax cuts expire without reinstating them? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Letting them expire......
which means no bipartanship required.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bottomtheweaver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
16. That's change I can believe in.
I hope he sticks to his guns.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-09 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
18. That's my President! He is living up to every campaign promise
and then some.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endersdragon34 Donating Member (325 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
19. Not buying it...
Okay he raises the deficit from .45 trillion... to 1.75 trillion... then he says he will cut it in half. Isn't that still almost twice what it was last year? And hes going to do this just by raising taxes on the wealthiest 5% and ending the war in Iraq, while upping up the war in Afghanistan and possibly starting a new war in Western Pakistan (he already has said he plans to many times). I don't think there is a chance that they could pay THAT much, and switching the war efforts will just cancel each other out more or less. Yes he plans to cut some wasteful programs... but he is going to certainly start some new programs of his own (health care won't come cheap) while maybe its a better use of our deficit... its still our deficit. And yes we will get quite a bit of money back when the recession ends (CBO said it was going to end by the end of the year, even without the stimulus package), but not anywhere near enough considering some states won't want to take over the programs he is starting. How long until China stops loaning us money, haven't we already proven we are a credit risk? I am sorry, I just don't believe him about this budget deficit, and I think it will hurt the Democratic party come '10 just like Clinton got hurt in '94. Obama's main hope is to say he turned the economy around single handedly, and hope no one listens to what the CBO has to say... it could very well happen.

P.S. Just so you all know A) I am an independent, I don't trust either party, and B) I already have my flame proof vest on so do your worst!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC