|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 11:55 AM Original message |
Now, for a little Sunday flavor, Rahm Emanuel. “Undersecretary for Go Fuck Yourself" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
1. Meh. I'm not a big Rahm fan. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 12:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Sometimes it is helpful to at least understand a person's thinking behind what they do. This |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 02:35 PM Response to Reply #4 |
43. Ohh, titchy titchy. Where did I say the OP wasn't informative? I just said I'm not a big Rahm fan... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 11:58 AM Response to Reply #1 |
97. I guarantee you, he'll get over it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. You're gonna get a whole lotta "ihaterahm", of course... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 12:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. I see that and I expected it. I don't really know why people wouldn't want a better understanding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 12:22 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. We're Americans. We don't believe in knowing much of anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ginnyinWI
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 12:27 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. I liked it and laughed out loud. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 02:14 PM Response to Reply #6 |
38. He criticized Dean so he must be EVIL and CONSERVATIVE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 04:54 PM Response to Reply #38 |
57. He didn't "criticize" Dean..he fucking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 05:07 PM Response to Reply #57 |
64. Nor should you rewrite history. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 05:13 PM Response to Reply #57 |
65. aaaawwwwhh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 08:17 PM Response to Reply #65 |
71. It made an asshole outta of Rahm.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 08:18 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. only to the two percenters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freemarketer6
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
3. I am not a fan of Emanuel. Sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ananda
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 12:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I understand that Rahm has tax problems also. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 12:29 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. You know it would be the same with the Repubs if not worse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 12:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. Interesting that those "tax problems" only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frazzled
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 12:24 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Who said you have to be a fan to read a profile in the New Yorker? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freemarketer6
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 01:16 PM Response to Reply #8 |
26. It is if you make the wrong response and are ushered out. I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frazzled
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 01:41 PM Response to Reply #26 |
34. There is no such thing as a wrong response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Hope Mobile
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #26 |
52. Have you been ushered out before? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 02:39 PM Response to Reply #3 |
44. I'm not either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
freemarketer6
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 02:54 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Good. Glad to see I'm not alone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lorien
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 11:21 AM Response to Reply #44 |
87. Me either. He reminds me of dozens of assholes that I used to work with in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 10:36 AM Response to Reply #3 |
82. For some reason, the President seems to be a fan of Emanuel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
10. I wouldn't mind a "Rahm says, "Go Fuck Yourself!"" T-shirt...shit I'll make one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
12. I'm a huge fan of Rahm. A rare breed here, I know. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
14. I'm a Rahm fan and I loved the story. Thanks you so much for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
15. Ah, you changed the title |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 12:40 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. It needed more spice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
16. Awesome piece, thank you. And it makes me wonder more if... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thickasabrick
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
18. I love his attitude. I wish more democratic politicians had his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 12:48 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Which is kinda what we need |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brazenly Liberal
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
19. Rahm is a very results-oriented, effective guy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
20. I'm glad Rahm is on our side. I like him! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 01:03 PM Response to Original message |
22. He's right - they need results, and they aren't executives of a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GeorgeGist
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
23. Politics is a game with players, sponsors, and spectators ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
24. I've had my issues with Rahm but he is perfect for this job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 01:25 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. Live and learn. Obama does learn from his mistakes and wont make them again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robeson
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 01:13 PM Response to Original message |
25. Interesting article. Thanks for posting it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RubyDuby in GA
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
27. I wholeheartedly agree that Rahm can go fuck himself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 01:23 PM Response to Reply #27 |
29. Did you bother reading the article? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 01:40 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. I read the whole article. Not why he clashed with Dean. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 03:35 PM Response to Reply #33 |
49. oh, BS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 04:44 PM Response to Reply #49 |
53. Wait....we won the 2006 midterms. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 04:52 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. yes we did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 04:57 PM Response to Reply #56 |
61. Yes, you won. Rahm won. Dean lost. He is out of party leadership. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 01:18 PM Response to Reply #61 |
101. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 03:33 PM Response to Reply #27 |
48. the failure of the person in your avatar demonstrates just why a president needs "an ass." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 04:45 PM Response to Reply #48 |
54. Howard Dean and Jimmy Carter are each worth two Rahms any day. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 04:54 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. Dean managed to win how many states in the 2004 primaries? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 04:55 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. The DLC and the Rahm folks won. You won. The party is yours now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 04:57 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. asking questions is acting superior? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 04:58 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. I am not playing your games anymore. You have the power here now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
camera obscura
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 04:58 PM Response to Reply #48 |
62. yeah, and Kerry was a world better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 05:14 PM Response to Reply #62 |
66. apparently he was. He won the nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 11:10 PM Response to Reply #66 |
75. So did Carter in 80 and So did Mondale in 84 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 05:47 AM Response to Reply #75 |
78. which makes Dean an even bigger "fucking loser," right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 07:03 AM Response to Reply #78 |
80. I guess the same could be said about Bill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 07:48 AM Response to Reply #80 |
81. nope, and not the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 11:08 PM Response to Reply #48 |
74. Howard Dean was a better candidate than Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 05:47 AM Response to Reply #74 |
79. Dean failed in the only way that can be measured, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1776Forever
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
28. I bought Rahm and Bruce Reed's book - The Plan and it really makes some great points! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
31. I read the snippets for now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 01:30 PM Response to Original message |
32. Rahm is going after Krugman now? I prefer Krugman, thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 05:48 PM Response to Reply #32 |
69. And Rockridge was one of the best things we had going. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
35. What it boils down to now is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 12:20 PM Response to Reply #35 |
100. A strawman on top of an appeal to authority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
36. Terrific article - Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
37. The Sec of "Go Fuck Yourself" has a nice ring to it an Rahm fits the bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
39. I can see where Rahm would have some appeal.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 02:34 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Yes, top down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tatiana
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
40. He "thinks like a Chicagoan." That is why he makes a perfect COS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PopSixSquish
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 02:32 PM Response to Original message |
41. I Died Laughing When I Read About the Nameplate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 02:46 PM Response to Original message |
45. I knew all this. I have met Rahm and STILL don't like him. This isn't "Change" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
47. Bipartisanship: "we dont have to succeed, we just have to try" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 03:46 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. The way people misread what people say is just astonishing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baikonour
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
51. When debating a Nobel Prize winning economist... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 04:51 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. It was a putdown of Krugman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 11:20 AM Response to Reply #55 |
86. I disagree. It was a very valid point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 11:39 AM Response to Reply #86 |
91. If that was what he said, I might agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 11:55 AM Response to Reply #91 |
94. OMFG. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 11:57 AM Response to Reply #94 |
96. Look, I have no problem with Rahm going after Krugman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 12:12 PM Response to Reply #96 |
99. I agree with Rahm that Krugman has never tried to get a bill passed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radical Activist
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 10:10 PM Response to Reply #51 |
73. No, its a valid point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 12:30 AM Response to Reply #51 |
76. And Krugman is probably laughing his arse off at Rahm's distemper. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 11:23 AM Response to Reply #76 |
88. Krugman doesn't appear to take criticism very well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 11:42 AM Response to Reply #88 |
92. Neither do you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 11:56 AM Response to Reply #92 |
95. Oh good grief |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 11:58 AM Response to Reply #95 |
98. No, read above. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 11:15 AM Response to Reply #51 |
84. Oh FFS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
67. Rahmbo's da man. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
68. He comes across as a major creep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 11:16 AM Response to Reply #68 |
85. Well I think Kurt Cobain was totally overrated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1
![]() |
Sun Feb-22-09 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
70. I don't like Emmanuel at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cash_thatswhatiwant
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 01:18 AM Response to Original message |
77. LOVE rahm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brianna69
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
83. I love Rahm. He's a total badass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonestonesusa
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
89. Rahm in charge also insures no change in our policy towards Israel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 11:35 AM Response to Reply #89 |
90. Rahm is Secretary of State, too, now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 11:43 AM Response to Reply #90 |
93. he's also President now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonestonesusa
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 01:31 PM Response to Reply #90 |
103. He's not secretary of state. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712
![]() |
Mon Feb-23-09 01:24 PM Response to Original message |
102. File this under "He's an asshole, but he's OUR asshole!" n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genna
![]() |
Mon Mar-02-09 06:11 PM Response to Original message |
104. I like Rahm too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC