Karl Rove on the lam??? He was AWOL for House Judiciary Committee subpoena today.

[ddeclue]

according to Air America Radio just now.

[grasswire]

1. send the Capitol Police NOW

How many times is he going to give Conyers the finger?

Arrest him NOW. Confiscate all records and computers.

NOW!

[Captain Hilts]

2. Just a deposition. I don't think you're required to testify when you hand it in. nt

[ramblin_dave]

3. A deposition has to be given at a specified time and place

Rove would have to show up and be questioned.

[Captain Hilts]

4. I do not think being questioned that day is necessarily part of submitting a deposition.

I wish it were so.

If it were, I think Conyers would be there ready to rant if he were not going to show.

[rateyes]

5. The subpoena required him to show up and answer questions

posed by Judiciary Committee lawyers. He can't "mail that in."

[Captain Hilts]

6. My point is, is he required to testify TODAY? If so, why isn't Conyers there?

I'm not trying to be difficult.

If he is required to submit to questioning today, why isn't Conyers there?

[rateyes]

11. I would have liked for him to show up. But, it wasn't required on his part...

It was required on Rove's part.

Don't get me wrong. Most people know that I think John Conyers has been nothing but talk. All bark, no bite.

[Captain Hilts]

12. I agree with your assessment of Conyers and would like to make him 'collateral damage' here.

He should be there going ballistic.

[AndyTiedye]

7. Time to Make Karl do the Frog March

I'm surprised nobody posted this by now:

[Captain Hilts]

8. I like "perp walk." But, if the White House isn't pushing some of this, what is Congress to do? nt

[DeepBlueC]

9. that's the beauty of separation of powers

[WeDidIt]

10. Some people are above the law

Karl Rove, for example.