Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Schwarzenegger vs. Jindal - Political Games vs. Constituents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 02:09 PM
Original message
Schwarzenegger vs. Jindal - Political Games vs. Constituents
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Schwarzenegger-vs-Jindal-by-Steven-Leser-090223-993.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
February 23, 2009

Schwarzenegger vs. Jindal - Political Games vs. Constituents

By Steven Leser

With Louisiana's Bobby Jindal and California's Arnold Schwarzenegger we have two Republican Governors, one who cares about the people of their state and one whose primary focus is playing political games. Jindal said that he would refuse on behalf of his state part of the federal stimulus money from the bill Obama put forth and was passed by congress last week. Schwarzenegger, on the other hand, is happy to get all he can for struggling California. Jindal is typical of the Republican party's approach to President Obama since his inauguration. No matter how Obama reaches out his hand across the aisle for bipartisanship, Republicans like Jindal and Mississippi's Barbour are more interested in playing political games to obstruct Obama than working to help their constituents. As reported by the New Orleans Time Picayune http://www.nola.com/news/index.ssf/2009/02/jindal_catches_flak_for_reject.html Jindal said he would:

"…refuse $98 million for federal unemployment assistance because he said it comes with strings that would obligate the state to make permanent, costly changes in its law and would mean higher taxes and more administrative headaches for businesses."

--------------------

Jindal is leading a coalition of as many as six Republican governors who say they will reject part of the stimulus money for their state. Most are using the same dishonest argument as Jindal. The truth was stated clearly by a Republican legislator from Jindal's state, Sen. Robert Adley, R-Benton who the Times Picayune reports as saying "We should never put ourselves in a position where we say we don't want it."

Adley said he does not think the unemployment benefits need to tie the state permanently to the program and that the Legislature could control the program's impact in later years.

---------------------

With Adley's statement, we have stripped away any legitimate reason for Jindal and the other GOP governors to reject stimulus money headed for their states. Their motive is purely obstructionist, purely political.

I disagree with Gov. Schwarzenegger on many issues, but on the issue of the stimulus its clear that the govenator has his eyes firmly on how to help the people of his state. As reported in the Washington Post,
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/21/AR2009022101682.html?hpid=topnews :

Asked about Jindal's and Barbour's pledges to turn away stimulus funds aimed at expanding state unemployment insurance, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger quipped, "You just tell them that anyone that doesn't want to take the money: I'm ready to take their money and rebuild California."

----------------------

Schwarzenegger wasn’t the only Republican governor who refused to play political games with the future of their state. Minnesota's Governor Tim Pawlenty and Florida's Governor Charlie Crist also have the right priorities. Said Crist in the above Washington Post article:

state needs as much federal help as available for education, infrastructure, health care and transportation. "We plan to utilize it for the people of our state as much as possible," he said. "I'm thinking about people, not politics."

----------------------

Nothing that Republican politicians do ought to surprise me anymore, but the actions of the Jindal six to play politics with the economic future of their constituents during one of the worst economic crises in the history of the country is surprising and revolting. The political games being played by the Jindal six will hurt those most affected by the economic downturn, the unemployed. The reason they are doing this? It is to try to hurt Obama and to try to prop up Jindal for a potential run against Obama in 2012. Jindal is trying to get all the publicity he can because he is trying to overcome an expected bid for the Republican nomination by Sarah Palin who has the name recognition from her failed Vice Presidential bid. So this entire episode consists of multiple layers of political games where the constituents of the states headed by the Jindal 6 are the big losers.


I think the Republican Party and its elected officials have not learned the lessons from their last two election losses. The people of this country had already come to realize that the GOP doesn’t care anything about them before this latest callous and calculated rejection of help for their constituents. The Republican Party will again be punished by the voters in 2010 and 2012 if they have become the party of political gamesmanship and obstructionism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not all Republicans are cut from the same cloth.
I happen to like my governor here in California, and I didn't care much for Gray Davis (D) before him.

Thanks for the post.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I'm neither a fan, nor am I against him, but...
I think it is important we all acknowledge that he is right here, particularly in contrast to Jindal and Barbour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hellataz Donating Member (804 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. I sincerely hope the GOP base understands fully how their party is working AGAINST them
After watching that HBO Documentary by Pelosi's Daughter and listening to the moron McCain supporters during the campaign, I'm not convinced that they understand the what their representative are doing to them. They are all too busy trying to oust Obama from Office and freaking out over a Dem or even a Black man in office that they don't ever notice that he's the one trying to help their poor, unemployed, struggling asses! While the GOP government is trying to cause more hardship on them. This is where the ignorance really runs rampant, they can't see past their own bible belt beliefs and hate towards people of color to understand that they are hurting themselves.

My only hope is that maybe a handful of them realize this as the rest of the country begins to recover and their states continue to decline all due to lack of government funding and aid. Of course you know ignorance will kick back in and they'll end up blaming Obama anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'd settle for all the Democrats and Independants in their states
If every Democrat in Florida voted Democratic, for instance, a Republican would never win statewide races there. A majority of the Democrats in the panhandle vote GOP in statewide races. I think this is true in many southern red states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC