Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Orly Taitz Cons Army Officer Into Joining Suit (More Birther Crap)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 03:37 PM
Original message
Orly Taitz Cons Army Officer Into Joining Suit (More Birther Crap)
Edited on Mon Feb-23-09 03:37 PM by WeDidIt
This could end up with this First Lt. being court martialed:

http://images.quickblogcast.com/4/2/6/6/5/166425-156624/scottconsent.bmp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who cares about this nonsense? Obama is already the President
Edited on Mon Feb-23-09 03:40 PM by Thrill
Those people are nuts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well, yeah
But now they've convinced a commissioned Army Officer to join in with their nuttery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. They don't believe he's President you see...
They call him the "usurper" and it's not unusual to see calls for military coups on the birther websites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. *Now* he's worried about being given unlawful orders.
:eyes: Lying, fucking hypocrites.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Lt. Dumbfuck is history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Yep.
BuhBye!!

I got their birth certificate right here:

:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. She finally found a sucker.....
She's been trying to find an active duty sucker or two for a planned lawsuit, but all she could find are retired personnel. Looks like her next lawsuit is going to cost someone his career in the Army.

And he's in a war zone to boot. Oh, this is gonna go well.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Once his superiors find out, he'll be thrown in the brig
This is a huge violation of the UCMJ.

It's a direct attack on his superior in the chain of command plus conduct unbecoming.

He's toast. At best, all he gets is a dishonorable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stargazer09 Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I wouldn't be so sure
Military members are usually brainwashed to believe that the Republicans have their best interests at heart, so his superiors may not say or do anything against him over this.

I agree with you, though. It's definitely conduct unbecoming an officer.

This whole situation is just so stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yeah, but.....
1) Active Duty military donated 6:1 to Obama over McCain, and:

2) Openly saying you will not follow the orders of one's commander is pretty much a crash landing, even if the person's superiors believe in what he's said.

Whichever way you slice it, he fucked up his career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stargazer09 Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. I hope you're right
I'd love to see the idiot's career go down in flames.

I'm not sure where you got the 6:1 statistics; my husband is active duty and has had to listen to his coworkers constantly criticize Obama ever since the election. Everyone I work with at my Guard job are die-hard Republicans, but since I live in a "red" state, that's to be expected. Maybe we just haven't met the more intelligent members of the military community (the ones who donated to Obama).

I did get a laugh out of McCain complaining about Marine One to Obama the other night. He made it sound as if Obama insisted on a new helicopter for himself. Nice try, McLoser!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. It's mutiny
Edited on Mon Feb-23-09 04:46 PM by WeDidIt
He has openly questioned his superior's right to give him an order.

That's mutiny.

He'll end up being happy to take the dishonorable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Agreed!
I was looking at this link

http://www.jag.navy.mil/documents/mcm2008.pdf

I'm counting at least:
888. 88. Contempt toward officials.
892. 92. Failure to obey order or regulation.
933. 133. Conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman.
934. 134. General article.

With possibles on:
889. 89. Disrespect toward superior commissioned officer.
890. 90. Assaulting or willfully disobeying superior commissioned officer.
894. 94. Mutiny or sedition.
917. 117. Provoking speeches or gestures
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wmbrew0206 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. No Article 89 0r 90
The POTUS is not considered a Commissioned Officer. He would have to be part of the Armed Forces to be a commissioned officer and that would conflict with civilian control of the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stargazer09 Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Oh, I agree!
I know it's mutiny, and a bunch of other violations of the UCMJ.

I'm just saying that the guy's superiors have to be *willing* to press charges, and a lot of them might be willing to look the other way.

The problem is that someone has to make a big stink over this in order for anything real to be done. Since it hasn't made the national news, and since it's just a Lt. and not a General, it will probably be swept under the rug.

I hope I'm wrong about that, of course. I kept my mouth shut and obeyed orders under GWB, despite my personal belief that he stole the election from Al Gore. This guy should have kept his mouth shut and obeyed orders, too. Part of being an officer is the fact that you're not supposed to speak out against the President, either. The guy definitely deserves to be punished, but like I said, his superiors have to initiate that process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wmbrew0206 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. No, it is not mutiny.
I don't see anywhere he was working with or encouraging other military members to refuse legal orders. That would be mutiny.

He is refusing a legal order. It is something that happens when a subordinate believes he is be asked to carry out an unlawful order given by a superior. Clearly there has been no illegal order given here since Obama is clearly the POTUS.

If it takes this idiot officer taking his court marshal result to the SCOTUS to put this birther crap to bed, than I welcome this stunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Sounds like he found a novel way to get out of the war zone. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. You might have a point there /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rove karl rove Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. and to get some attention
two birds, one stone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. Orly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. Orly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. This is a VERY VERY VERY stupid thing for the Lt to do...this is very stupid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
23. I'm hiding this thread, cause I don't give good fuck about the birthers......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
24. Does anyone know what makes "Dr." Taitz a doctor?
I hope she's not claiming it's her juris doctor degree, which certainly does not confer the title of "doctor" (even when it's from an accredited institution, unlike the law school that Ms. Taitz attended).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC