If you're going to repeat the factually unsustainable claim that six companies control everything we read, see or hear, at least try to be up to date. The amount of information in your post that is out of date is astounding.
More on that in a minute. On a larger level, I'd love to hear an explanation how the six companies listed control everything we see, hear, and read when, on a combined basis, they control only 2 of the top 100 newspapers (by circulation) in the US, one of the three major news magazines, virtually none of the 14,000 radio stations and around 60 percent of the television stations (and that's giving them credit for the stations that they don't own but that are affiliated with their networks). They also represent an infinitesimal portion of the sites available on the internet. A more up to date discussion of this wildly exaggerated claim:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=389&topic_id=5153281#5153669Now, back to fact checking. Here are some facts not reflected in your post:
Time Warner: AOL is no longer the dominant ISP. It doesn't have 27 million subs anymore. It barely has 7 million. And Time Warner hasn't owned record labels since 2004 and it hasn't owned any sports franchises since 2005. And it will be divesting its ownership of any cable systems sometime in the next month.
Disney: It also hasn't owned any sports franchises since 2005 and it sold the bulk of its radio stations and its radio network years ago. As for its 720 DIsney Stores wordwide -- most have closed. In fact, Disney got out of the retail business almost entirely here in the US, and only recently got back in because the company it sold out to went into bankruptcy. Sold its ownership in newspapers years ago.
Bertelsmann -- still big in publishing (Random House) -- but out of the music business.
Viacom - CBS and Viacom split several years ago, but since National Amusements (Sumner Redstone) still has a controlling stake in both, let's over look that. HOwever, its hard to overlook the suggestion that VH1 and MTV are supposed to be "competitors." No one who has watched these channels in years would make such a claim.
News Corp. -- Sold the Dodgers in 2004. If they have seven other "news" channels in the US, I'd love to know what they are. Indeed, at the time the information was compiled, they only had the one. Now, arguably, they have two, since they've added a business news channel.
My point, made in the linked post, isn't that things are hunky dory in the media. Its that if were going to make media ownership an issue, its important to have our facts straight.