Wait, wait, wait...Bobby Jindal was in congress for two years, right?

[Drunken Irishman]

Yet when Bush was putting forth his budget in 2005 and 2006, years Jindal was in the congress, why didn't he object?

If he was so opposed to spending, how could he support those budgets? Better yet, how can he now rebuke the spending under Bush when he sat idly by and allowed it?

[Rosa Luxemburg]

1. he'll say 'who me?'

[DJ13]

2. Object?! He was the King of earmarks!

Someone posted a link here yesterday that showed he had gotten over $94m in earmarks passed in those two years.

[elleng]

3. THAT is a good piece of info;

along with 'he lied,' I think we know the rest about him.

[Hamlette]

4. I read that he supported Bush in his votes 100%

but people who are not defending him say "we can't go back in the time machine" (ha ha) what is past is past.

Idiots.