|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
itsrobert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 12:31 AM Original message |
Judge Judy for Supreme Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SamCooke (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 12:32 AM Response to Original message |
1. She wont take the pay cut |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baby Snooks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:33 AM Response to Reply #1 |
14. OMG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
firedupdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
2. No Way! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 12:52 AM Response to Original message |
3. That would drive Scalia and Thomas up the wall wouldn’t it? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nomorenomore08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 01:04 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Oh my God! I just had the most hilarious visual of her and Fat Tony squaring off! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baby Snooks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:35 AM Response to Reply #3 |
15. Thomas? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
4. Nice idea, but I'd go with Jonathan Turley |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:27 AM Response to Reply #4 |
12. I like the sound of Justice Allyson K. Duncan or Justice Elizabeth Gibson |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
islandgirl808 (255 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 01:12 AM Response to Original message |
6. "honey... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ensho (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:25 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. "never co-sign anything with a boyfriend" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:08 AM Response to Original message |
7. Are you crazy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snake in the grass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:37 AM Response to Original message |
8. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 04:38 AM Response to Original message |
9. NO! She's terrible, even as a cheesy TV judge with little cases. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ensho (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:26 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. hold up! there is nothing 'cheesy' about the Judge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 01:17 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. She's nothing but cheesy, and wholly unqualified to judge above municipal level. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 12:38 AM Response to Reply #23 |
30. she's better than the asshats who decided the 2000 election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:37 AM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Deleted message |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 01:19 PM Response to Reply #16 |
25. Judge Judy is a terrible judge, completely unqualified. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:52 AM Response to Reply #9 |
19. Yet, I'd still call her more qualified than Thomas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ericgtr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
13. I saw her on Larry King and she was impressive, totally pro gay marriage too n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:45 AM Response to Original message |
17. Only if she is tasered before she accepts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msallied (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
18. Love her! I'd support it! lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiranon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 11:15 AM Response to Original message |
20. No. We need someone young and ready to stay on the bench for a long time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
21. Beats the Turley suggestion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 11:52 AM Response to Original message |
22. Ulp! Barf! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
24. Her husband is a federal judge actually. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 01:26 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Don't think so. What court? Who appointed him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unsane (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 01:28 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. nm I lookd. It was a NY state court. I remember in law school reading a case authored by him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
watercolors (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
28. You must be kidding, I hope! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 12:37 AM Response to Original message |
29. OMG what a fun idea - and televised decisions! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC