|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
TreasonousBastard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:43 PM Original message |
So howcum nobody's suggested Michelle for... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
1. someone did. there was a thread on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:48 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Absurd? In Washington? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TreasonousBastard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Of course it's absurd-- you mean somebody seriously... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:51 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Umm, sense of humor is not allowed in GD or GD-P. Didn't you get the memo? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TreasonousBastard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 11:04 PM Response to Reply #8 |
13. The dog ate the memo.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 11:07 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Now you're blaming pit bulls for your ignorance? Or is it ALL dogs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TreasonousBastard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 11:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. It was that nasty little... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
2. Making Hatch's head explode (figuratively) might be worth it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
3. because most people aren't that stupid? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:49 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Sure they are. How else do you explain Reagan, two Bushes, and Dane Cook? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:51 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I meant actual people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:52 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Didn't forget her, but I just ate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogcycle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. augggghhh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. This is beginning to look like the story scene from "Stand by Me" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rwheeler31 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
6. She was recommended many times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 11:39 PM Response to Original message |
16. Because that would be an unacceptable level of nepotism and conflict of interest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 11:43 PM Response to Original message |
17. She's not a judge. And does not have a particularly distinguished legal career of decades |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
avaistheone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 09:48 AM Response to Reply #17 |
23. Oh please stop. You are making too much sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 03:37 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. LOL! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-01-09 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
18. You jest. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Umbral (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
19. If you just want to make Orrin Hatch go boom... How about Rocky Anderson. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gauguin57 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:22 AM Response to Original message |
20. I think we should suggest it, just to watch more freeper heads explode! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 02:57 AM Response to Original message |
21. No, really piss them off, Bill Clinton! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TreasonousBastard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 09:18 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Hillary! And Bill at State. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:18 AM Response to Reply #21 |
26. President Clinton as a Justice would literally make the Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:15 AM Response to Original message |
24. Conflict of interest, but the resulting boom as heads explode |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
25. Is that legal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
27. I think support in the Senate for the SCOTUS nom matters enough that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
28. I did.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-02-09 11:04 AM Response to Original message |
29. She has a pretty big job as First Lady and it would be a glaring conflict of interest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 13th 2025, 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC