:wtf:
Hate and a Question of Rights
By Kathleen Parker
Sunday, May 3, 2009
Once a cause such as hate-crimes legislation becomes associated with something as emotionally devastating as the savage murder of Matthew Shepard in 1998, it becomes difficult to question the merits of the issue.
That is one lamentable fact.
Another is that too often those articulating the merits, or lack thereof, make many of us wish we could switch planets.
Witness Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.), who, in recently questioning the need to extend federal hate-crimes legislation to include sexual orientation, managed to make any further debate nearly untenable.
Who wants to join forces with someone who would use the word "hoax" in regard to Matthew Shepard's murder "that continues to be used as an excuse for passing these
bills"?
This was not one of the GOP's brighter moments in a field lately dim with low lights.
What Foxx meant, of course, was that those advocating expansion of hate-speech protections to include sexual orientation often cite Shepard's case as justification.
Hate as a motivation is a relatively easy case to make in Shepard's horrific murder. A 21-year-old freshman at the University of Wyoming, he was picked up in a bar by two monsters posing as gay men, who lured him outside to rob him. They then beat him so severely that he died of his injuries.
<SNIP>
As an operating principle, meanwhile, it seems wiser to hear and see the haters rather than criminalize their thoughts and banish them to the underground where their demons can fester and where no law can breach their purpose.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/01/AR2009050102827_pf.html