Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How about Russ Feingold for Supreme Court Justice?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 08:57 PM
Original message
How about Russ Feingold for Supreme Court Justice?
Edited on Sun May-03-09 09:02 PM by FrenchieCat
:shrug:

I mean, he's independent, fair, unbiased, has plenty empathy and life experience...and doggone it...he's young enough. Ok, so he's not a Hispanic Female, but still, he'd be a great pick if looking outside the bench in an inspirational way!

I'd just like to see him disagree with the RW cabal over there! Just thinking about it would be sweet! :)

After graduating from Joseph A. Craig High School, Feingold attended the University of Wisconsin-Madison and graduated with a Bachelor of Arts degree with honors in 1975, a member of the Phi Beta Kappa honor society. He went to Magdalen College at the University of Oxford on a Rhodes Scholarship in 1977, where he earned another Bachelor of Arts degree. Upon returning to the U.S., he attended Harvard Law School, receiving his J.D. with honors in 1979.<4>

A recipient of the John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage Award, Feingold is known for his cosponsorship of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act ("McCain–Feingold Act"), a major piece of campaign finance reform legislation. He was also the only Senator to vote against the USA PATRIOT Act during its first vote.

Feingold worked as an attorney at the private law firms of Foley & Lardner and La Follette & Sinykin from 1979 until 1985.<5>

In 1982, he was elected to the Wisconsin State Senate, where he served for ten years until his election to the United States Senate. In 1987, he joined the "Bowtie Brigade," a coalition of grassroots activists and local-level politicians who backed the presidential candidacy of bowtie-clad Senator Paul Simon of Illinois.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russ_Feingold#Career
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BluegrassDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. And get yet another Senate seat open?
I don't think we can risk anymore open Senate seats right now. The replacements are turning into circuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. No,
please don't pull out anymore Senators, especially not progressive ones.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Awe,...come on!
There's always Lieutenant Governor Barbara Lawton to be appointed by the current Dem Governor. And Barbara Lawton is great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Okay, I'm convinced. I wanted him to be president, but this works for me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. He's not gay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. And?
He's empathetic.....I think that's important! Heck, Andrew Sullivan is Gay....but I wouldn't want him as a justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. And? And he's a white male.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hell, why not Michelle Obama?
She's a lawyer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. She's married to the President....that's why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. The "Bobby Kennedy Rule" applies....no more nepotism! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Ahh hells,
... next thing you're gonna be getting down on hedonism.

Though, if it's a Bobby Kennedy Rule, maybe you're right. I wouldn't want her to get Bobby Kennedy'd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. It got tossed into a postal law in 1967, But it was in reaction to Bobby Kennedy.
You can't hire relatives for cabinet positions or to work in your Congressional offices is what it says, pretty much.

Not sure about Supreme nominations, but I don't think that would go over too well!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LooseWilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. See, now that's just dumb.
It would be one thing if they weren't qualified... but Bobby Kennedy sure seemed to be able to do the job. Of course, he was killed before I was even born... so what the hell do I know?
All the same, that's a solution to nepotism that's so hamfisted that it undermines meritocratism... potentially at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. It used to be very common for congressmen to hire their wives or
brothers or sisters for "no show" or "no work" staff jobs back in the old days. After this law was passed, those jobs went to the mistresses!

Now, they actually have to work at it if they want to play the nepotism game, and find another congressman to trade with them--I'll hire your husband if you hire my wife, that kind of thing. And the workers actually have to show up and do a little work.

I don't think it includes grandkids. I seem to remember they tried to nail someone, Maxine Waters, maybe, for hiring a grandson as an intern.

The Bobby Kennedy thing wasn't without controversy. Amongst Democrats, it was no big deal/great/swell--and the "Ethel and the zillion kids" and Hickory Hill mystique all added to the "Kennedy story," the gossip and crap that has nothing to do with governance (like the Obama kids and dog and the wife's clothes, etc.) but that the public just eats up with a big fat spoon.

The GOP, though, were bullshit--they were like wet hens about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. Nepotism's not so bad as long as you keep it in the family.
*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
9.  We don't need to keep dragging people out of the Senate.
Enough, already. I am hoping for a female nominee whose personal heritage includes the Spanish language. I think we need more representation that looks like a substantial segment of America ....and tangentially, will delight a branch of my family, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-03-09 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. He would be completely great but we could lose a Senate seat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
13. Tom Geoghegan! I know it sounds like I've started a campaign tonight
This guy is a simple man, a labor lawyer who has fought for years in the trenches. He would make an impact on the SCOTUS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reterr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
14. yes
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
17. All things being equal, I'd rate him a mighty fine pick.
But all things aren't anywhere near equal given the scandal of having only one female member among nine Supremes. I have to think that the better course for Obama is to choose a female justice from the many well-qualified candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
18. Yes, we should definitely open up the seat of one of our best Senators,
so we can put a con-law lightweight on the Supreme Court. That's a win/win, all right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
20. How about Milorad Blagojevich?
:shrug:

Prosecutor, Legislator, Governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-04-09 03:21 AM
Response to Original message
21. I'd kind of like to keep him as my Senator,
but is picking a person who is the most qualified for a position even allowed by Democrats anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
24. No. We need to keep independent voices like that in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
25. Be a shame to lose one of the last principled voices in the Senate.
But I could go for a Justice Feingold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC