Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

First Read has Napolitano on SCOTUS shortlist.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:11 AM
Original message
First Read has Napolitano on SCOTUS shortlist.
Not a bad choice... but kind of bummed since she could have taken on McCain for the Senate Seat.


*** The SCOTUS shortlist? According to a couple of sources in the know, there appears to be a working short list of about six names for President Obama’s Supreme Court pick. The co-frontrunners (in no particular order): Diane Wood of the 7th Circuit, Solicitor General Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor of the 2nd Circuit, Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and Merrick Garland of the DC Circuit Court of Appeals. Obviously, folks can slice this list all they want: Five are women; one’s Hispanic; one’s male; and all are in their late 40s or early 50s, except two (Wood, 58, and Garland, 56). Keep an eye on Napolitano. For this pick, it would be surprising if Obama named someone he didn't either know well or trust personally. Wood, Kagan, and Napolitano all fit this bill (Wood taught at the University of Chicago with Obama, and Kagan and Napolitano already have top slots in the administration). As for Napolitano, remember that she endorsed Obama early on (despite Emily’s List pressure to do otherwise). And from people familiar with the president's thinking, he's been as impressed with Napolitano as anyone in his cabinet. They click. That matters....

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/05/11/1928014.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Janet
She does have a sort of judicial air about her. A proven liberal with a history of winning despite conservative peers and constituents. Could work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. I would love to see Janet Napolitano on the SC.
She is really brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. NPR said he wants a non-judge, non-academic, like Earl Warren
Edited on Mon May-11-09 09:54 AM by HamdenRice
I think that's actually a really good choice. It isn't as some have implied that he wants someone without a legal background. But he wants someone rooted mostly in the "real world."

This show (don't remember which) also made a pretty brilliant point: the main qualification for the next judge is persuading one man -- Justice Kennedy.

When Kennedy votes with us it's a semi, quasi liberal court; when Kennedy votes against us, it's a conservative court.

99% of the job until the next justice retires, is lobbying Kennedy. That requires a politician/administrator.

Napolitano sounds about right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. Janet would do great at anything she tried.
I was kinda hoping she'd be our first female President in 2016 though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC