Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's Supreme Court Shortlist (Wood, Sotomayor, Kagan, Granholm, Napolitano, Garland)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
liberalpragmatist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 05:29 PM
Original message
Obama's Supreme Court Shortlist (Wood, Sotomayor, Kagan, Granholm, Napolitano, Garland)
Take it with a grain of salt, as one would all anonymously sourced rumors...

From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro

*** The SCOTUS shortlist? According to a couple of sources in the know, there appears to be a working short list of about six names for President Obama’s Supreme Court pick. The co-frontrunners (in no particular order): Diane Wood of the 7th Circuit, Solicitor General Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor of the 2nd Circuit, Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and Merrick Garland of the DC Circuit Court of Appeals. Obviously, folks can slice this list all they want: Five are women; one’s Hispanic; one’s male; and all are in their late 40s or early 50s, except two (Wood, 58, and Garland, 56). Keep an eye on Napolitano. For this pick, it would be surprising if Obama named someone he didn't either know well or trust personally. Wood, Kagan, and Napolitano all fit this bill (Wood taught at the University of Chicago with Obama, and Kagan and Napolitano already have top slots in the administration). As for Napolitano, remember that she endorsed Obama early on (despite Emily’s List pressure to do otherwise). And from people familiar with the president's thinking, he's been as impressed with Napolitano as anyone in his cabinet. They click. That matters....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
deadmessengers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. It won't be Napolitano.
It's a shame, because Janet Napolitano is wonderfully qualified for the job, but I don't think the President would want to invite back-to-back confirmation fights - one for the Court, one for her backfill at DHS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I heard today from some political reporter that it COULD be Napolitano.
That was on MSNBC. I was surprised.

It seems odd to me, tho. Why would Obama go to the trouble of appointing her to Homeland Security if he secretly wanted her on the Supreme Court? He knew there was a better than average chance he would get to fill a vacancy.

I just don't get it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. because he needed her for Homeland Security
look at her background in law enforcement matters, border issues as Governor, Attorney General and head of the US Attorney's office in Arizona.

besides, Obama had to know he would get another chance to appoint her to the USSC at some later point. he's likely to get 3 appointments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thats not a reason to not nominate her. He would have to do
that for Kagan too. And I think Kagan will get it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. he may have intended Napolitano for the court but not an immediate appointment
but a later one instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Diane Wood has all the marks of the SAFE CHOICE -- Husband, children, not "activist"
Sorry to say, but that's the way it is. To quote Bob Marley for Barack "I don't need no more troubles .."

From Wiki

Wood was nominated by President Bill Clinton on March 31, 1995, to a seat vacated when William Joseph Bauer took senior status.

She was confirmed unanimously by the United States Senate
and received her commission on June 30, 1995.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I think age is an issue there. They need someone younger than Roberts
in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. The RWingnuts are already asking her to resign over the Bush Admin
terrorist watch re: some soldiers could be recruited. I agree with a previous poster that she may be a future pick, but I don't think he wants a big fight over his first pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SamCooke Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. We need to get a Pamela Karlan petition going
we must get her on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Petitioning the Admin is good, even if she does not get on now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Not exactly authoritative!
'According to a couple of sources in the know, there appears to be a working short list'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-11-09 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. I am sure that Obama will choose someone qualified but I have a
hard time getting excited about replacing Souter. I want to replace the Felonious Five and that is not going to happen. If Obama gets other chances they will be other reasonable judges like Stevens and Ginsburg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. That's the big problem.. I'd be happy if we could just get rid of one of them in the next 8 years nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm still holding out for Sustein. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-12-09 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. If it's the short list it's a pretty good one. But who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC