Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

the military industrial complex is not acknowledging their new c.i.c.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 04:44 PM
Original message
the military industrial complex is not acknowledging their new c.i.c.
i have to say that, much as i love my president, i think the permanent powers that be are not accepting him as the man in charge. this comes as no surprise to me, but is a disappointment. i really thought he was savvy enough to push back and maybe even win. maybe in the long run he will.
i do think that he went in understanding that this part of the job was going to take a long time. that, imo, is why he kept gates. he wanted an insider to help back the beast into a corner. hopefully, he is just letting them play it out while he tend to other things, and building trust with them.
but jesus. please tell me that at some point he is going to go to the pentagon and start kicking ass and taking names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. On what are you basing this impression? What should they be doing for him that they are not? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. this clown that has been put in charge in afghanistan,
and something about the way leon panetta is sticking up for the cia strikes me as creepy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. You find it creepy that the Director of the CIA is sticking up for the CIA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. just something about it
he could be in there making it the obama cia, and drawing a bright line separating themselves from the misdeeds of the bushies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. True.
I think he's probably trying to pick up the pieces left by his recent predecessors, so he's probably decided that, at least for the moment, his role as Director outweighs his role as a member of the administration.

Annoying, I'll agree, but maybe not that surprising.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. There's nothing wrong with Panetta sticking up for the CIA
Pelosi went to the press and told them that the CIA lied to Congress but could not possibly have made a weaker case to prove it. Given how weak her case was, Panetta was absolutely right in sticking up for the agency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. What?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Calm down. Obama isn't going to go in pissing the Military off his first few months in office
especially while they're fighting two wars. At least not on every issue. I don't think anyone is having a problem accepting he is the one in charge.

If they did, you would be hearing anonymous quotes undermining some of the things he's done or is doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I hope you are right
I think this is at the crux of whether we will have real change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. He has no motivation to do so. They don't want to be in Iraq any more than he wants them there.
There's a lot of common ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Gates has fired more top commanders than any Secretary in recent history


He is also dismantling expensive exotic and unnecessary high tech systems.


He kept Gates because Gates hates DC, could care less for contractors and is committed to equiping real soldiers with what they really need.


Gates' interview on 60 minutes last Sunday was very revealing, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Thanks, grant
for that little important bit of enlightenment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Yeah. After I watched that, I saw why Obama wanted to keep him
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. i will try to track that down.
yes, i agree he is willing to wield the knife.
thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. And it lends bipartisan credibility to whatever Obama wants to do with the Pentagon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC