Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jake Tapper is a douchebag and MickeyMouse/ABC Spews shit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 06:57 PM
Original message
Jake Tapper is a douchebag and MickeyMouse/ABC Spews shit
Why are they even taken seriously as an organization anymore? Completely-outed conservative dinosaur, Charlie Gibson, is horrible. Tiny elfin Stephanopoulous is clearly a mean spirited fairy of doom toward anything progressive. Jake Tapper is taking gotcha sound bites and headlines to a new low.

I think we should all remind our relatives and friends how far that previously stellar news organization has fallen. No more Peter Jennings. No more Ted Koppel. It is barren of any news value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree!
In addition to that, their nightly news broadcast consists mainly of fluff and human interest stories. Nothing substantive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I agree. They went "Katie" on us. You can tell who their audience is.
All they have is advertisements about adult diapers, acid reflux medicine, and Viagra. They are all drawing the 60 yr old and up crowd. Many women. All the 60+ guys are split between corporate crap on ABC/NBC/CBS and the ones who are saluting the flag while staring at their dog tags and being programmed with talking points by Brit Hume, Sean Hannity, et al.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. It was the last national news network I took seriously.
It was very sad to see it go down the crapper. I don't take them seriously and I don't watch. Tapper is Limbaugh disguised as a journalist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is the first time, I've ever seen so many WH correspondents
get treated as experts. They are just supposed to report the news from the WH. Not offer and throw in their opinions on whats happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. They're allowed to have opinions if they attack Democrats.
If they give an opinion about Bush's its "liberal media bias."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Tapper use to be a good reporter but
he soldout 10 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMachineWins Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. TV is an ongoing disgrace of 1 misdirected, tension-creating whore after the other
It's pure propaganda, both corporate and government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I agree. I killed my TV.
No satellite. No cable. No broadcast. Just get my news from newspapers, NPR, online, and periodicals such as The New Yorker, Harpers, and The Economist.

I'm able to stream The Daily Show, Steven Colbert, and Frontline...so I am happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. The network that airs John Stossel long ago lost any credibility
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. That douchebag used to keep his libertarianism under wraps in the 80's.
when Hugh Downs actually knew what was going on around him. Think of it. That was when Geraldo Rivera was still somewhat credible before his many melodramas and talk shows.

TV journalism in general was of a much higher caliber back then. Or at least that is my belief as I've watched over the years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Demise of media regulation (including but not limited to the Fairness Doctrine)
Edited on Mon May-25-09 11:35 PM by depakid
Back in the 80's, a person who falsified data (repeatedly) would have been blacballed from the industry. Now it's par for the course in America.

Part and parcel to the culture of lies that's developed, where dishonesty isn't simply overlooked- it's actively promoted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. exactly. They lie so hard on FoxNews that you don't notice as much when NPR is deceiving you
whether it's about something like gas prices or Israel. Who knows what to believe anymore? That's why I focus only on news that either directly affects me or is likely to have ramifications for me and my family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-25-09 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. It's not like that in other nations
but unfortunately, only people who've lived long enough to remember -or have spent enough time abroad understand that the current dreck is neither "the way it's always been" nor "the way it is everywhere."

Nope- among all the Western industrialized nations, America and hence Americans are quite uniquely handicapped by the practices of their "mainstream" mass media.

Actually, it's gotten so bad over the past 10 years or so to have become downright insulting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I agree. When I was still watching TV last year I saw CNN. then went to Europe
and watched BBC and obviously there was a huge difference in quality, accuracy, and focus.

HOWEVER, what was more shocking and insulting was the fact that CNN International was like what CNN used to be here. Way more topical, informative and crisp with the facts of the world's news. But CNN in America is nothing but stupid blowhards' opinions on whatever manufactured narrative they decided on the day or days before. No matter what of any actual import happens, they pimp their stupid canned bullshit. That is...until some 3 year old white girl turns up missing. or there's a photogenic car chase. Or BREAKING NEWS about Obama having the GALL to play golf on his Memorial Day weekend AFTER he gave a speech at Arlington and delivered wreaths to various national cemetaries.

It is sick. WHY OH WHY DON'T THEY MAKE INTERNATIONAL travel a requiement to be a US citizen past the age of 25. It is so stupid that people here don't even have a frame of reference to realize how shallow and vapid their lives are. And how they're being lied to and seduced into quiet consent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. I'd be just as happy if other nation's news was simply allowed onto a cable channel
It's not like there aren't tons of useless spam channels in the states. People might recognize that- hey, those Aussies: they get healthcare- and people don't shot all the time- and those Europeans we love to hate, they get paid vacations. And a lot more than Americans usually do.

The list goes on. Yep, some perspective as to how others live would a real good deal for folks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asphalt.jungle Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. but the BBC isn't the proper way to compare and contrast with cable news
If you watched Sky News while you were there you wouldn't have noticed much difference between them and American cable news. Same bullshit just with different accents.

try searching for Newswipe with Charlie Brooker on youtube or something, it's a comedic British news review and you will see they are in the gutter as well. And if they aren't quite as low as we are, they are fast approaching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. which is why I compared US CNN vs. CNN international. please read more slowly
I specifically mentioned I had expected a contrast with BBC and discounted that. It would be like comparing FauxNews to PBS news coverage like Jim Lehrer.

I was upset with CNN International clearly being marketed as real news over there. But apparently we in the US aren't judged as mature enough to care about actual news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. I watch BBC's half hour broadcast on PBS
It's also topical, informative and crisp, as you say. Not the BBC America one though--just the barebones PBS half hour. As for American broadcasts, PBS Newshour has far more information than any of the networks.

So that's my current mix: Newshour and BBC, and then one or the other of the MSNBC evening shows for the liberal take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asphalt.jungle Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. What about England?
I think they are the worse. It doesn't get much worse than The Sun, The News of the World, The Daily Mail (Heil), The Telegraph (Torygraph), etc. Rupert Murdoch used England as a right wing propaganda testing ground before setting his sights on America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Nah, the British tend to know the difference between "tabloid" and "hard news"
They (like the Aussies) they enjoy their tabloids- but recognize what they're all about.

Americans on the other hand- much of their their news (espeically TV and radio) has been morphed into tabloid form- to the point where it's tough to tell the difference.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asphalt.jungle Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. yeah the sun and notw are tabloids, but what about the rest?
Edited on Tue May-26-09 01:36 AM by asphalt.jungle
the telegraph, the times and the daily mail aren't tabloids, they are suppose to be "hard" news. the daily mail is lou dobbs in print format and they reach a larger % of their domestic population than lou could ever hope for in america. the times is murdoch's original attempt to have a non-sleazy fishwrap in his portfolio. the right wing papers are the best sellers in england.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. they are laughed off in England. while in England I've never seen tabloid masquerading as news
like here in the U.S.

They hand out tabloid newspapers free every day in central London. But you know what you're getting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
22. Stossel Flaunts His Bias
such an asshole.

and who can forget the absolute worst presidential debate in history.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. next to the definition of "Simpering" in dictionary is a picture of fucktard, Charles Gibson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
25. John Stossel...
:puke:

I can't stand him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
15. Ah yes
I remember them fondly in the primaries...god help us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC