|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
cali
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:14 AM Original message |
Repubs: She's not really very smart. she's an affirmative action appointment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
1. I've heard somewhere that she was one of the top two in her Princeton graduating class. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JayMusgrove
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:22 AM Response to Reply #1 |
11. So that canard from Republicans is just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
2. Republicans: She's smart. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
3. Appointed by Poppy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:17 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Appointed to appeals court by Clinton nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:19 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. so was Souter. Do you think that because she was first appointed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:24 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Not necessarily. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solomon
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 10:50 AM Response to Reply #12 |
33. LOL They don't understand you Rummy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoadRage
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:17 AM Response to Original message |
5. She was initially nominated by George H.W. Bush. Tell them to STFU! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
6. Same thing they say about the President... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JayMusgrove
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:24 AM Response to Reply #6 |
13. Yes, I wonder if Sonia uses a teleprompter!!!!!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
a kennedy
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
7. thought this thread fit perfectly......Anatomy Of A Sotomayor SCOTUS Whisper Campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:21 AM Response to Original message |
9. Thats a hard sell when you look at her academic background |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:22 AM Response to Original message |
10. That may be the knee jerk reactions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalmuse
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:29 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. They obviously don't care about the female vote... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:26 AM Response to Original message |
14. Since when did the GOP worry about "not smart?" What a bunch of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 10:49 AM Response to Reply #14 |
32. Good point. Didn't Bush campaign on being an "average" guy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:30 AM Response to Original message |
16. They are such little people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:32 AM Response to Original message |
17. AA is appropriate in this case. As you said, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TimesSquareCowboy
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:34 AM Response to Original message |
18. She graudated a Catholic High School, so that fits with the Republicans main criteria. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:37 AM Response to Original message |
19. Just heard fred barnes belittling her intelligence on Fuqs News. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rocktivity
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
20. I've got two words for them: Harriet Miers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvd
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:44 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. LOL - true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 10:10 AM Response to Reply #20 |
26. She looks a lot older in that picture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JamesA1102
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:45 AM Response to Original message |
22. How ever said Republicans were smart?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFW
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
23. Plus--she fails the crucial Republican "activist" test |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
24. The confirmation hearings will undoubtedly prove them wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
25. Minor correction. She was not an editor of the Yale law review |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
masuki bance
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 10:18 AM Response to Original message |
27. Turley is saying the same thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 10:19 AM Response to Reply #27 |
28. yep. and it's still pernicious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamthebandfanman
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
29. oh who gives a fuck, shes gonna be given the thumbs up. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
30. Let the motherfuckers piss off a bunch of Hispanics with that shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geiger
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
31. calculated words. how low the scumbag R's go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
34. Like Roberts and Thomas? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
otohara
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
35. She Was Smart Enough When Confirmed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 03:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC