Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A few words about Judge Sotomayor's legal "philosophy" (and a resource)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:44 AM
Original message
A few words about Judge Sotomayor's legal "philosophy" (and a resource)
Edited on Tue May-26-09 09:54 AM by HamdenRice
Perhaps the first thing to note is that, like the Justice she will be replacing, Justice Souter, she is a bit of a stealth judge. She hasn't decided any monumentally controversial cases. As with Justice Souter, it will be difficult to predict how she will decide controversial cases that come before the Supreme Court on the basis of her past judgments.

This is because she was an appeals court judge in the Second Circuit. The Second Circuit includes New York, Connecticut and Vermont. The hot button issues tend to be litigated in states that are challenging controversial precedents -- abortion, prayer in school, death penalty and so on.

The legislators and public officials of New York, New Connecticut and Vermont generally don't try to limit abortion or place granite sculptures of the Ten Commandments in public places. None of the Second Circuit states have attempted to execute anyone, so she's never decided a death penalty case.

Her only controversial decision was in the New Haven firefighters' case, but she didn't write the opinion.

So what kinds of cases have come up to Judge Sotomayor in the Second Circuit? Lots of criminal procedure and immigration cases. I'm sure that many securities and financial cases have come before her, but these are not likely to be understood by the general public, let alone rile up the general public.

Most of the opinions she has written that have been summarized by the Supreme Court blog (Scotusblog) are about the minutia of criminal procedure and of immigration procedure.

The only thing one can conclude from the record of her opinions is that she has not tried to "make law" from the bench and has scrupulously followed precedent in highly technical procedural cases. Her participation in the New Haven decision, her background, and her experience as both a prosecutor and trial judge, suggest, however, that she will be in favor of affirmative action, and that she will support procedural rights of criminal defendants. She is by all accounts a terrifically nice, sociable person, and some commentators have speculated that her most important "audience" is Justice Kennedy, the swing judge; her sociability will help in bringing Justice Kennedy around on controversial cases. She is also a voluble questioner during oral arguments before the appeals court.

It will be difficult for the Republicans to "paint" her as anything in particular, in terms of judicial approach.

You can read summaries of her major opinions at the Scotusblog, here:

http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/judge-sotomayor%E2%80%99s-opinions-with-dissents-%E2%80%93-part-i/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's useful. Thanks! n/t
:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
2. Being from CT myself, if someone tried to place a ten commandments granite sculpture
anywhere they would be laughed out of the state. We go to church but don't shove it in anyone's faces.
I think her judgments show at the very least she is a middle of the road liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. And I don't think any state legislators are about to introduce abortion restrictions either
Political suicide in the 2nd circuit states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. The point about Kennedy is the key. We need majority opinions not flaming dissents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yup. Apparently, flattery will get you everywhere with Kennedy
If you make Kennedy think that you think that he is very smart, he'll vote your way.

And if we get Kennedy's vote, we get the right outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. self serving kick for the after work crowd nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-26-09 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Her confirmation is a lock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC