|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Mayberry Machiavelli
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 12:46 PM Original message |
Where does the talking point that Sotomayor is not intelligent come from? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
1. Comes from know-it-alls like Turley |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 12:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Add sexist and homophobes to the list. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
2. gonads? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
3. It's the same strategy as getting Obama split-screened vs Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 12:51 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. How could they possibly equate the two? Sotomayor has a credible resume for SC Justice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 12:56 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Well they are republicans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
5. A jealous prick called Turley. He turned it into a meme that all the Repubs love. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PretzelWarrior
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
6. these were talking points discussed before she was even chosen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 01:05 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Harriet Meiers was woefully inexperienced for the job. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
10. Jonathan Turley spewed that talking point this morning on msnbc and on NPR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 02:18 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Who is Jonathan Turley? I see his name atop threads here all the time. "Turley". As if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 02:20 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. He is a constitutional law scholar from Georgetown University. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asphalt.jungle
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 04:15 PM Response to Reply #14 |
28. George Washington U. not the great G'Town |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quiller4
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 04:22 PM Response to Reply #14 |
29. George Washington; not Georgetown and scholar is an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 05:41 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. I stand corrected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 02:45 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. I don't recall seeing/hearing him before, but after reading the posts about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
11. Karl Rove and his ilk. It's classic dogwhistling. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mazzarro
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
12. Wow! - she is good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
15. Comes from the ass of folks bringing it up...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
16. Actually, let the right wingers believe she's dumb if they want to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBR
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
17. People who wish they could have been accepted to Princeton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
18. From the ones who would not recognize intelligence if it stared them in the face (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rufus dog
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 02:47 PM Response to Original message |
20. The party that nominated Sarah Palin for VP is calling Sotomayor dumb! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 03:07 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Great talking point...and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EquallyExhausted
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
21. because women and minorities are always assumed to be lesser by the white male power structure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tledford
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 03:13 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. DINGDINGDINGDINGDING!!! We have a winner! And welcome to DU! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
23. White supremacy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uponit7771
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 04:08 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Well,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NatBurner
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
24. because princeton and yale law are party schools |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mayberry Machiavelli
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 04:05 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Well, it's no Boise State, but I heard you still got a decent education there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit
![]() |
Tue May-26-09 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
31. For the same people who brought you Dan Quayle and George W. Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC