Heads Up: Olbermann is going to have Turley on to discuss Sotomayor
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:02 PM
Original message |
Heads Up: Olbermann is going to have Turley on to discuss Sotomayor |
|
Edited on Tue May-26-09 07:03 PM by jenmito
For anyone who does NOT want to see his (Turley's) face anymore today!
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:03 PM
Response to Original message |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. We'll see. HOPEFULLY he WILL... |
|
but I'm afraid he'll just let Turley talk and won't challenge him.
|
gkhouston
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
8. Remind me why Dana Milbank isn't on Countdown anymore... |
|
I'm think Turley could be on thin ice.
|
Thrill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:04 PM
Response to Original message |
3. No Keith for me tonight. |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. That's why I put out the warning.. |
|
I'LL watch it and see if Keith challenges him.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:05 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Olbermann is praising Sotomayor, even mentioning the RW talking point about how she's not |
|
that smart. We already know Turley feels she's not smart enough. I hope Keith holds his ground.
|
Spazito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Turley will say she is smart but that's somehow different from having... |
|
'intellectual depth' and then will go on, as he usually does in his wordy way, to try and defend his outrageous claim. He is so predictable, imo.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
hopefully Keith will challenge him.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
You called it! Then he went on to say she may very well "find her stride" or something to soften his criticism.
|
uponit7771
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
uponit7771
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message |
9. He's coming on next, I think he'll punk out of the positions on her he took earlier... |
|
...he'll have to have some minerals to say those things in front of KeiF nem
|
vaberella
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:16 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I know...it's killing me. n/t |
Drunken Irishman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:18 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Can't watch that douche (Turley, ot Olbermann). |
O is 44
(740 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:20 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Thanks for the heads up... |
HopeOverFear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Lord help me I'm screaming at the television |
uponit7771
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:22 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Turly genuine objection = "..she's had no outstanding opinions..." like Scalia's opinions are a work |
|
Edited on Tue May-26-09 07:23 PM by uponit7771
...of art.
He sounds like he's punking out of his earlier positions
WTF is this issue with "temperament"
|
Raine1967
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
17. He couched it differently |
|
HE is afraid of KO I think. I still hear that dogwhistle...
|
vaberella
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
22. I had the feeling KO was waiting for him to say something stupid.. |
|
KO had a smirk on his face when he mentioned..."weak arguments" if you noticed.
|
uponit7771
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
25. I saw the look on his fce at the end of the segment, he look like he had to hold his opinions ... |
|
...back in order not to be challenged.
Another Chuck Todd type IMHO, someone who says what the crowd wants instead of the truth...someone who wants to be like more than respected.
|
HopeOverFear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:24 PM
Response to Original message |
15. OH NOW THIS MOTHERFUCKER'S TRYING TO BACKTRACK |
uponit7771
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
19. Yeap, you see that look at the end of the segment? Like, "damn, I can't say what a really want to" |
uponit7771
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:24 PM
Response to Original message |
16. "she's quite bright"....yeah, he's punkin out now... |
|
...wimping out in front of folks
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
23. What a phony! He heard what Keith said in the first segment and didn't want to |
|
alienate himself fron him. If he had, he wouldn't be allowed on the show anymore (at least in his mind). Punk.
|
chimpymustgo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
26. Turley pretty much said what he said earlier today about Sotomayer. He calls 'em like he sees 'em. |
uponit7771
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
29. Thurgood Marshal comment was necessary? It made it sound l ike he had a grudge and |
|
...wasn't being objective when it came to her.
Also, he complimented Scalia but had some criticisms for Marshal and Sotomayor...that in and of itself placed him on the overtly critical side of the spectrum
|
JayMusgrove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
30. Turley wound up as a commentator on TV because.............. |
|
he's not very bright in legal intellectual circles and needs to make a million or two before retiring.
He's about as honest as a hooker on 7th avenue. ANYTHING for a buck.
|
vaberella
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
O is 44
(740 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
|
I love your assessment, that's him in a nutshell!
|
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
38. I do declare, there were times I was so lonesome that I watched him on the air, |
|
doo doo doo, doo doo doo, doo doo doo.
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
32. Not really. He almost seemed to SUPPORT her. He was much less critical of her |
|
tonight and stressed positive traits. He must've listened to Keith's first segment and heard that Keith's aware of the RW talking points.
|
vaberella
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
34. I got that...but he already sealed his position and right now he's just hiding his true colors. n/t |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #34 |
36. Yup. He may have changed his position on Keith's show so he gets called |
|
back to his show, but we saw him give his REAL opinion earlier and won't be fooled by his "nuanced" position.
|
PopSixSquish
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:26 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Wow - He's Back Pedling as Fast as His Little Feet Will Carry Him |
|
Somebody got taken to the woodshed and told what's what...
|
vaberella
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
24. Totally...I noticed that and posted it. Man. n/t |
EquallyExhausted
(58 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:31 PM
Response to Original message |
27. it seems someone has checked his email or something since his earlier comments |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
35. AND it seems like he heard Keith's first segment and didn't want to be |
|
called on the RW talking points.
|
Number23
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:34 PM
Response to Original message |
28. Times like this that I am glad that MSNBC does not play in Australia |
|
I am FURIOUS that this prick would demean the history and legacy of Thurgood Marshall. Absolutely FURIOUS.
|
Karenina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
firedupdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue May-26-09 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Jan 13th 2025, 09:08 PM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.