|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
vaberella
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 05:32 PM Original message |
Ed Show: Rep. Joe Sestak said he will be running in Pennsylvania. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
1. Harry Reid promised this would not happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 05:47 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yup. Sestak went on The Ed Show and said he was preparing to run. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pirate Smile
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 05:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. I just saw him on CNN and he left himself wiggle room by saying he hadn't yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 06:36 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. He said the same on Ed, but basically went on the record as saying... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 09:05 PM Response to Reply #1 |
24. I'm pretty sure you're joking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DURHAM D
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 09:16 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Nope - Reid promised him no primary opponent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 09:30 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. BWAHAHAAAA!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blue neen
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
3. Things sure are going to get interesting here in PA! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 05:53 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. I read up on him when the whole Spector crap went down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lugnut
![]() |
Thu May-28-09 12:32 AM Response to Reply #3 |
37. I don't either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
4. Get ready for the media to play this as "Obama weakness" or "Obama vs. Sestak" and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 05:53 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Yup, but I'm not too worried about that. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rvablue
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
7. Interesting given that I read a headline on the Hill.com today that the President is going to appear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 05:56 PM Response to Original message |
8. Oh Fuck, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 06:00 PM Response to Original message |
10. This is Lamont/Lieberman Redux. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
11. Rep. Joe Sestak is one excellent legislator. I wish I lived in PA so I could support him. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
12. Must read: The inimitable Nate Silver asks, "Is Sestak the Right Choice for the Left?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 06:38 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Are you kidding? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MH1
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 08:40 PM Response to Reply #14 |
21. I'm from Sestak's district, and I say Silver doesn't know what he's talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 11:55 PM Response to Reply #21 |
32. Okay, because that's what I've read. I do listen to a lot of Nate Silver's statements. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA
![]() |
Thu May-28-09 07:11 AM Response to Reply #21 |
39. Sestak is a DLC "New Democrat" like Evan Bayh and Ben Nelson. He's no liberal/progressive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ebbie15644
![]() |
Thu May-28-09 06:58 AM Response to Reply #12 |
38. re: Joe Sestak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 07:05 PM Response to Original message |
15. I'm from PA and I will support Sestak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Senator
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
16. Sestak Coulld Kill Two Beltway-BS Birds With One Stone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
solstice
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
17. Good and I hope he wins! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lochloosa
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 08:15 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Welcome to DU solstice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
solstice
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 08:36 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. Thank you very much :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCBob
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
19. Not sure how I feel about this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
22. I am from Pa and he willl lose. This is a foolish career move on his part if he pushes on with this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 09:04 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Alot can happen between now and Aprill 2010 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs
![]() |
Thu May-28-09 02:06 PM Response to Reply #23 |
44. May 2010 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 09:08 PM Response to Reply #22 |
25. What has he got to lose? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Thu May-28-09 12:11 AM Response to Reply #25 |
35. And, he loses any change of Dem backing in any future race. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 09:30 PM Response to Reply #22 |
29. I'm from PA and it's not foolish. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Thu May-28-09 12:07 AM Response to Reply #29 |
33. He will run and lose. The party is behind Specter and he is well respected and liked throughout PA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Thu May-28-09 12:10 AM Response to Reply #29 |
34. The Dem vote will be weakened and Toomey has a better chance of winning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlexanderProgressive
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
26. I support Sestak over the long-time Republican opportunist flip-flopper n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
30. Run, Sestak, Run! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
invictus
![]() |
Wed May-27-09 10:11 PM Response to Original message |
31. Sestak will win! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria
![]() |
Thu May-28-09 12:16 AM Response to Reply #31 |
36. I don't think so. He has the party backing, more money and respect and name recognition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number9Dream
![]() |
Thu May-28-09 07:15 AM Response to Original message |
40. Lehigh Valley, PA resident for over thirty years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Thu May-28-09 01:56 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. Specter has 74% approval among PA Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number9Dream
![]() |
Thu May-28-09 02:45 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. That's sad - even among the 561 Dems surveyed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante
![]() |
Thu May-28-09 04:33 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. It's a pretty typical sample size for a state poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71
![]() |
Thu May-28-09 07:27 AM Response to Original message |
41. I live in MD and prepared to drive up to Philly and elsewhere to GOTV for Sestak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kjackson227
![]() |
Thu May-28-09 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
42. I like Sestak (he seems like the real deal), I hope he wins... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WeDidIt
![]() |
Thu May-28-09 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
46. Ya know, I think I'll donate to Specter on this one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thu Mar 13th 2025, 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC