|
Walk them through this formula.
They go to work, part of their wage goes to them, part of their wage goes to taxes, and part of their wage goes to pay for health care.
That part that goes to health care, a part of it pays for lobbyist to set social policies that CEOs like.
Part of the money that goes to pay for health care goes so one CEO can make half a billion dollars a year.
Part of the money goes to pay people like Glenn Beck to create anger so people will be scared.
Part of the money goes to buy a politician so they can take larger portions of the money a person pays for health care.
Part of the money goes to name a stadium or a park, so people will think the insurance companies are nice and kind, when they are just after the money.
Part of it goes to media or PR trying to make people think the problem is government.
Corporate systems take a slice of payments just like a tax does, Who do they give it to? Some goes to people with shares of stock, many go to 'friends of theirs' by laundering money with million dollar offices, and some goes to lavish salaries. And if you think when I say shareholders, I mean pension funds, the banking sector makes sure pensions are wiped out with bubbles. So that payment gets put back into the CEO and upper class wallets also.
If they have a need for an 'us or them', just move them to class 'us or them', and they will implode their own side. Although I think it is best for people to live in moderation instead of contention.
What is a better thing, a person of color or not, getting some health care from their taxes, or one person getting half a billion dollars a year from their taxes? When they say "neither its their money", then bring up that if there is a public option, then those crazy obscene payments to CEOs would have to be lower for them to be able to compete. The ideas they like, free market principles at work.
If a CEO makes half a billion a year, pay someone 20 million, and they will find you someone that can do a better job for only 5 Million a year. That is an example of competition. Where someone can bid for that guys job because the club is not a closed system that protects itself for profit for itself, but the system is so corrupt, nobody that controls things like that want lower pay for a CEO, because it is a buddy system where they are all scraping as much off the top without stopping anyone else from doing the same thing. It is monopoly price setting not competition. And that will change.
Many good people make lots of money, but the system that maintains such payments is skewed, and it comes from a tax from people.
|