"Do YOU want Ted Kennedy, Jesse Jackson and Barney Frank picking your next Supreme Court justices?"
bluestateguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 04:30 AM
Original message |
"Do YOU want Ted Kennedy, Jesse Jackson and Barney Frank picking your next Supreme Court justices?" |
|
Yes! As a matter of fact, I do.
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 04:31 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Sounds good to me, too. |
shanine
(322 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 04:37 AM
Response to Original message |
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 05:03 AM
Response to Original message |
zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 05:29 AM
Response to Original message |
4. I thought that Repugs wanted a robot who followed the Constitution and the law exactly |
|
as written ... and when a nominee came up who actually would have been twisting the law (and "legislating from the bench"), they had a fit.
|
no_hypocrisy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 05:54 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Sounds like a good start to me. |
|
I nominate Rep. Barney Frank to be the next Senator from Massachusetts.
|
polmaven
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Please let me be the first |
|
to second that nomination.
Rest in Peace, Teddy! We shall miss you greatly.
|
rox63
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 05:57 AM
Response to Original message |
WonderGrunion
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 06:21 AM
Response to Original message |
8. I want Obama to pick them |
|
But recommendations from the aforementioned are always welcome.
|
bluestateguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 07:32 AM
Response to Original message |
9. This was a line used by the Right for years to scare their base |
|
People seemed to have forgotten it, so I thought I would bring it up again.
|
City Lights
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 07:32 AM
Response to Original message |
Jim Lane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 08:35 AM
Response to Original message |
11. We could do a lot worse. And have. (n/t) |
Laelth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 09:12 AM
Response to Original message |
12. Um ... yes. And why not? n/t |
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 09:15 AM
Response to Original message |
13. Sure, why not? better than Coburn, Dobson & Hatch |
harun
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 09:22 AM
Response to Original message |
Milspec
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 09:54 AM
Response to Original message |
Frosty1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 01:22 PM
Response to Original message |
Phx_Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 03:41 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Sure do, and thanks for asking. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 06:59 AM
Response to Original message |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.