Anonymous Sources (Digby)

[Mass]

Digby makes an interesting remark concerning Harwood's remarks.
First, she acknowledged that the comment itself is irritating
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2009/10/anonymous-sources-by-digby-there-is-lot.html

Anonymous Sources

by digby

There is a lot of justifiably angry talk today about John Harwoods's report on last night's NBC Nightly News about the march for gay rights, in which he was asked if the White House was worried about "the left as a whole" and concerns they have that the White House isn't doing the things the left expected them to do. He replied:

Barack Obama is doing well with 90% or more of Democrats so the White House views this opposition as really part of the Internet left fringe.

For a sign of how seriously the White House does or doesn't take this opposition, one adviser told me those bloggers need to take off the pajamas, get dressed, and realize that governing a closely divided country is complicated and difficult.

But she adds an interesting comment concerning Harwood and how he has an history to make these vague and unsubstantiated comments that Obama does not need the left and is better off offending them. So, to what point is it possible that this comment was either non-existent or generated by somebody who wanted a favor?

Obviously, I have no way of knowing if any of this is true and nobody else does either. That's the beauty of anonymous sourcing, right? And that leads me to believe that while it's certainly possible that an administration official said this to him about the left, it's also entirely possible that Harwood made it up. After all, he has a habit of saying exactly the same thing in his own voice all the time. I've been documenting it for years. Here's an example:

SCARBOROUGH: John Harwood, our second question of the day, is it possible that the left could fall out of love with Obama if he fades on FISA, if he fades on interrogating, and if he seems siding with Cheney-Bush and the NSA on wiretapping?...

HARWOOD: No, it is not a problem for Barack Obama. This is one of those things that sounds like a problem, but if you really look at it, getting attacked from the left on national security issues is good news for Barack Obama, because it tells mainstream voters that he‘s not out on the far extreme and helps him counteract the attacks he‘s getting from John McCain and the Republicans.

...


Harwood spouts this line on a regular basis as a pundit. In fact he's so predictable that I know to look for it every time I see him on one of the gasbag shows.

It's possible that a White House official did say it; I certainly wouldn't put it past them. But I would guess that there's an equal chance that if he or she did, it's because the official watches Harwood saying it on TV every other week and was currying favor with him. After all, there is no villager more contemptuous of the left than John Harwood.

[babylonsister]

1. So Harwood has a history of this; good to know. Rec'd. nt

[SpartanDem]

2. Good find

this just futher proves that Harwoods claims are BS.

[Tarheel_Dem]

3. I wish DU & the left blogosphere weren't so quick to run with what amounts to rumors.

Anti-Obama folks look for this crap to stir up angst against an administration that they already dislike. Go figure.....