Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rahm is back, but who has the President's ear?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 10:48 AM
Original message
Rahm is back, but who has the President's ear?
Edited on Wed Oct-14-09 10:56 AM by ProSense
It's all over the blogosphere and media, Senators meeting with Rahm, which is meant to imply that the all-powerful Rahm is trying to sell out a public option.

At 2:30 this afternoon, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will host Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT), Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT), and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel in the first of several meetings presaging the merger of two major health care bills. The foursome is expected to discuss key issues at the heart of the reform process--affordability, Medicare, the public option, revenues--but no decisions are expected today.

more


Rockefeller talks directly with the President:

Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) told MSNBC this afternoon that President Obama "wants to come in hard" on health care reform now that the Senate Finance Committee has voted on their version of the bill.

Rockefeller said he spoke with the President today. MSNBC anchor Ed Schultz challenged him, asking why Obama spoke so highly of the Finance Committee's bill, when it doesn't include a public option.

"He's the President, you gotta cut him some slack. He's an inside player," Rockefeller said. "Don't worry about that. He wants the public option. He wants MedPAC. ... Now that the Finance Committee is finally out of the way we can move on."

Rockefeller sits on the committee and proposed a public option, but it was voted down.

link


This just in:

White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel won't be alone today when he huddles with senators about health care, as Brian noted earlier.

<...>

Rahm Emanuel, White House Chief of Staff

Nancy-Ann DeParle, Director of the White House Office for Health Reform

Peter Orszag, Director of the Office of Management and Budget

Phil Schiliro, Director of Legislative Affairs

Shawn Maher, White House Senate Liaison

Emanuel is a bit of a tough guy when it comes to his former colleagues on the Hill and his interactions with Reid haven't always been pleasant. But Orszag and Schiliro have a lot of fans among the Democratic senate staffers, and the White House wanted the whole team on hand so both political and policy questions can be addressed at once.


Got that? A meeting alone (which likely never or rarely happens when it comes to discussing official policy) with Rahm would mean he was pushing his own agenda, but now that four other people are involved, maybe, just maybe, this will be about the President's agenda.


On edit, forgot this one: Unions Stand Up to Rahm: Oppose Baucus Bill

Obama's statement: "A Critical Milestone"

The unions are right to oppose Baucus. In fact, numerous members of Congress believes it falls far short of the goals and object to specific aspects of it. Claiming that the unions are opposing Rahm for saying what the President says makes no sense.



Edited for clarity.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Rahm works for Obama
I've seen no evidence that he is disloyal to Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Of course there is no evidence. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. And he expects the PO to be introduced via the House bill...
... if nowhere else. But you already knew that. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. RE meeting alone with anyone doesn't mean he's working his own agenda.
He works the President's and administration's agenda.

These "rogue" Rahm threads are tiresome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes, the "rogue" Rahm threads are tiresome
Obama supports a strong public option, implying that Rahm is working against that goal is ludicrous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. OH.MY. GAWD! "...the White House wanted the whole team on hand so both political and policy
questions can be addressed at once"

You mean there is someone in Washington that understands the concept of efficiency! sensibility!

I'm sorry, but somehow this sentence jumped out at me as the most hopeful statement of the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-14-09 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. Let's see . . . do we try to please
Unions (hundreds of thousands of voters) + the Democratic base or 3-5 (if we're lucky) GOP senators? Hmmmm

I don't know. That's a tough one.

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC