Barnett v. Obama DISMISSED!

[WeDidIt]

10/29/2009 89 ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 56 : (See document for details.) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (rla) (Entered: 10/29/2009)

Link to Order on Scribd

First broken on Oh, For Goodness Sake.

:rofl:

This was the one. This was gonna break through.

Now the Birthers will blame their woe on a poor new clerk for Judge Carter because he did summer internship at the same (HUGE) law firm that Obama's campaign hired.

[eleny]

1. Cute kitty pics at the link, too

"Lean with it
Rock with it"

Great stuff!

[Adelante]

2. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I could SCREAM with glee :rofl::rofl:

[vaberella]

3. Too funny. n/t

[bluestateguy]

4. Wasn't this case the one the birthers had put the most stock in?

nt

[BklnDem75]

5. Yep, cuz Carter's an ex-marine

He was an honorable man... until now. I'm just waiting for the fireworks. :nuke:

[WeDidIt]

8. The Freepers don't have a post yet

:evilgrin:

This is gonna be GREAT!

[Mike Daniels]

12. Here's the FReeper response (just for laughs and giggles)

Not much on it yet but give it some time. I'm sure "pissant" will be dismissing Carter as a leftist tool before the hour is out.

Let the gnashing of teeth and ripping of garments begin.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2373840/posts

[PatGund]

19. Yep!!

This was the one that Dr. Orly was screaming was going to go to trial, had the date set and everything.

[WeDidIt]

6. THIS PART IS SUPERB!!!!! (Taitz suborning perjury)

"This Court is deeply concerned that Taitz may have suborned perjury through witnesses she intended to bring before this court"

Page 29

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

[hobbit709]

7. Shot down big time.

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

[Adelante]

9. Oh, man, this stuff about the military is HARSH - Haha

Birfoons sure misjudged this former Marine:

This “cut and run” call to lay down arms and leave this country defenseless is an effort by
Plaintiffs to emasculate the military.

Plaintiffs have inappropriately requested that this Court interfere with internal military
affairs. See Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 93-94, 73 S. Ct. 534 (1953) (“Judges are not
given the task of running the Army.”). Plaintiffs only seek to enjoin acts that the President takes
as Commander-in-Chief internationally, not domestically. This peculiarity leads the Court to
suspect that the constitutional objection is being used as a veil to avoid deployment to countries
where the United States military is currently active, such as Iraq or Afghanistan. See Rhodes v.
Thomas D. MacDonald et al., No. 4:09-CV-106 (CDL), 2007 WL 2997605 (M.D. Ga. Sept. 16,
2009) (Plaintiff objecting to President Obama’s natural born citizen status “had no concerns
about fulfilling her military obligation until she received orders notifying her that she would be
deployed to Iraq in September 2009”). Furthermore, Lieutenant Freese’s claims are based upon
the notion that his duty to serve is based upon who is in office. The duty to defend is not
dependent upon a political or personal view regarding the individual who serves as President and
Commander-in-Chief. It is an unequivocal duty to defend our country.

This Court will not interfere in internal military affairs nor be used as a tool by military
officers to avoid deployment. The Court has a word for such a refusal to follow the orders of the
President of the United States, but it will leave the issue to the military to resolve.

[WeDidIt]

10. About the only argument from the Defense that the judge didn't care for

was the specific argument that since Keyes et. al. had no chance of winning any way that they had no standing.

:rofl:

Oh man, this has been brilliantly played by Obama because now the Birfoons will try to raise a stink in 2012 and Obama will be able to present the same document he put online to a court and have a judge rule him a natural born citizen summarily!

He's played the Birfoons like violins.

:rofl:

[WeDidIt]

11. Freepers just caught wind

For those who like watching heads asplodin'!

CAUTION: Not for the weak of stomach. Shower liberally after clicking

[MiniMe]

24. I'm reading through now, though I haven't showered yet

What a hoot. A good many of them actually understand the ruling, and agree that only Congress can remove a sitting President. Those that understand are pretty much laughing at the birthers. They may not agree with Obama, but they agree with the ruling and that Orly and the birthers are making them look bad. However, they are saying that in 2012, these suits to show a birth certificate may be valid after the dem convention. Interesting.

[Ganja Ninja]

13. Orly's going to flip her whig.

Maybe it will land right side up this time.

[WeDidIt]

14. ORLY?

[PatGund]

22. Oh she has.....

From her website:

"As many of you know, Judge Carter has issued an order to grant the motion to dismiss.

Clearly it is not the end of the road. We will continue. I need some time to study this order and provide full answer point by point. I will not give a full analysis of judge Carter’s orders at the moment. Today I was inundated with phone calls from different media outlets. Interviews were given to different affiliats of FOX radio, CBS, WND, LA Times, LA Daily Journal, City report, I don’t remember all of them. One interview I remebered. It was with Jessica Rosenthal from FOX radio. She asked me, when will I give up? I asked her in turn: “Jessica, when do you give up on the Constitution of this country? When do you give up on your constitutional rights for redress of grievances, for your right not to be defrauded by the government, not be treated as a slave?”

It gets better:

"While I will not address the legal aspects of the order today, I will address a couple of issues relating to me personally, as I can see a concerted effort to assassinate my character similar to what was done to Sarah Palin, when she joined McCain, when within a day McCain-Palin ticket was 12 points ahead of Obama. What did Chicago combine do? They assassinated her character. So I have to address some of those issues, because it appears that the media has named me a leader of this movement. I am the only attorney, who brought legal actions from plaintiffs with real standing. I brought actions from active duty military and state representatives. My opposition see me as a threat. What was done? Some puppets were used to defame me, slander me, write garbage letters to judge Carter."

(snip)

"Citizens seem to have no voice, they have no standing to bring any legal actions in face of any fraud. They only have standing to pay taxes and pay for the judges, clerks, congress and senate who never address any issues. They should have no concerns about an inhabitant of the White house sporting 39 social security numbers, some are the social security numbers of the deceased. How long will it take for those citizens to revolt? Washington Post has written that 8 out of 10 Americans know about this issue. According to AOL-it’s 85%. This number is growing. How long will those people be silent? 4,5 million marched on Washington DC on September the 12th. How many will march next time around, when so many loose their jobs (half a million jobs every month officially) and probably double that number unofficially. When they loose their homes at a rate higher then the rate during great depression. When they become numb from hatred against this fraudulent usurper in the White House, corrupt politicians and corrupt judges. Who will stop them? A few snooty remarks on MSM and on the faithful to regime lap dog blogs like Politijab, Salon or Politico? When people loose their voice, when they are livid from the arrogance shown by the ruling elite, they simply revolt"

And what did Gary Kreep post on HIS website about it?

"U.S. District Court judge slams attorney Taiz saying her “argument often hampered the efforts of her co-counsel Gary Kreep (“Kreep”), counsel for Plaintiffs Drake and Robinson, to bring serious issues before the Court. "

Let the finger pointing begin......

[davidpdx]

23. The third statement you posted from her is so chock full of lies it could be a be a Fox News Report

Wow...just wow!

[iceman66]

15. This is very good news,

although I suspect they are going to keep filing identical cases in different districts hoping to find a judge who is a freeper at heart.

This will go on until Obama is out of office or Orly is disbarred. At the rate the CA bar is moving against her the former may well come first, even if he serves two complete terms.

[WeDidIt]

17. Orly's gotta be disappointed

She was looking forward to deposing Obama.

:evilgrin:

[Scurrilous]

16. K & R

:thumbsup:

[leftynyc]

18. And the freepers

get their hopes dashed again!! Wish I could feel sorrier for people who keep getting their dreams shit on but I'm not that big a person. I hope they wallow in their filth and ride their orly worship until the next election. Paint the entire party as a bunch of lunatics.

[WeDidIt]

20. They're already trashing Judge Carter

after proclaiming him their savior for weeks.

[Hokie]

21. Reality Check Radio will discuss this decision tonight

A couple of lawyers from the Politijab Forum will be on my show tonight on Blog Talk Radio at 9 PM EDT tonight to discuss the dismissal. These folks have been spot on with their analysis and predictions on the Birther cases and exactly how and why the judges have ruled to dismiss these nut jobs.

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/Reality-Check-/2009/10/30/Reality-Check-Radio--Special-Edition

[Kind of Blue]

25. Ooh, that stings. What a slapdown!

KnR

on edit: spelling