That always works out well.
Actually up until now, a lot of discussion/criticism has been shut down with comments like: How can anyone possibly know what they are talking about? There are three bills out there. Who knows what will end up in the final version? Hold your fire - who knows what will end up in the final version, etc. etc. etc.
Now, finally, is the final version that people can discuss concretely and with specifics and you chastise them for that! Meanwhile asserting there are no differences from . . . those other THREE separate bills. Oh, excuse me, you said they were "similar". But anyway, carry on.
http://www.businessweek.com/blogs/money_politics/archives/2009/10/pelosi_moves_ho.htmlPelosi Moves House Health Care Reform Bill
Posted by: Jane Sasseen on October 29
Congress moved another step closer to health care reform today, with the release by Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif) of a combined House bill that merged together key aspects of the three bills that had passed the House in the summer. The bill — which came in at a whopping 1990 pages - contained a few significant changes, though no great surprises. Perhaps the most notable thing about it: even as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev)surprised Washington earlier in the week by announcing that the Senate bill would be more liberal than many expected, Pelosi has been forced to push the House bill in a more moderate direction.
While Reid won plaudits from unions and the left of his party by pledging to include a public insurance plan that states can opt out of in the Senate bill, Pelosi backed down on her efforts to include the most aggressive plans for a public option in the House bill. For weeks, she had been pushing for a “robust” public option that would reimburse hospitals and doctors at Medicare rates. But conservative Blue Dogs and others from rural states would have none of it: they insisted that they would only support a public insurance option if it negotiates rates with health care providers like any private insurer.
skip
Lacking the votes to push the robust plan through, Pelosi offered up the more moderate alternative in the combined bill, which will now be sent to the floor of the House for debate. Pelosi aims to have a vote before Veterans Day, Nov. 11th.
In other ways too, the Speaker ended up with a bill closer to the version likely to emerge from the Senate. The House bill would impose a 2.5% tax on medical device makers starting in 2013, for example. With the Senate targeting device makers too -- they have suggested a $40 billion excise tax to be paid over the next decade, the provision aligns the two bills on the principal. Most analysts believe the fees will eventually be knocked down to somewhere between $20 to $30 billion, however.