Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

California Rep. Waters Is Under Investigation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 06:13 PM
Original message
California Rep. Waters Is Under Investigation
(10-29) 16:01 PDT WASHINGTON (AP) --

The House ethics committee said Thursday it's investigating whether California Rep. Maxine Waters used her influence to help a bank in which her husband owned stock — and whether the couple benefited as a result.

Waters is the No. 3 Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee and chairwoman of its subcommittee on housing. She has been an influential voice in the committee's work to overhaul financial regulations.

Waters came under scrutiny after former Treasury Department officials said she helped arrange a meeting between regulators and executives at OneUnited Bank last year without mentioning her husband's financial ties to the institution.

Her husband, Sidney Williams, holds at least $250,000 in its stock. He previously served on the bank's board.

The congresswoman has said the National Bankers Association, a trade group, requested the meeting. She defended her role in assisting minority-owned banks in the midst of the nation's financial meltdown and dismissed suggestions she used her influence to steer government aid to the bank.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/10/29/national/w160110D44.DTL#ixzz0VMyEWB4G
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Arfe they gonna investigate *&^%$(* Lieberman & Bayh for the assistance
they're giving the insurance industry in exchange for contributions & bribes filtered through their wives?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. When are these people going to learn
What a conflict of interest is, even if they are behaving in an ethical matter, there are things you have to recuse yourself of because of appearences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Like 250K is a helluva lot of money. This is why you can
hardly get anybody with integrity to get into politics. Politics has always been a dirty business but its gotten progressively worse over the years, as have the politicians. Fuck em, Maxine. Don't even dignify that crap with an answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes, 250K is a helluva lot of money.
At least to me it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Only a Wall Street bankster would think 250K is not a helluva lot of money
How much did you get in the bailout?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Waters came under scrutiny after FORMER Treasury Department officials said ....".
Thanks Bush and Co.!

Wouldn't know what to do without you!
On second thought, yes we would!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeap, read that and thought to myself "DISMISSED"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Fortunately the House Ethics Committee disagrees with you
Apparently they take ethics more seriously than some DUers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Garam_Masala Donating Member (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-29-09 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. I am for putting ALL crooks in prison...no matter what party
they belong to. There is too much corruption in politics.
We will have a much better country when all crooks are in
prison serving very long sentences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC