Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Since not everyone lives in Virginia... the 3rd party anti-Deeds ads were beyond belief

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 02:33 PM
Original message
Since not everyone lives in Virginia... the 3rd party anti-Deeds ads were beyond belief
Edited on Wed Nov-04-09 02:38 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
I wish everyone had seen these things because they set a strange standard for weirdness and audacity in negative campaigning.

Grainy footage is shown of Deeds being surrounded by reporters at some event.

He is asked a confusing question about taxes and says that he doesn't plan to raise taxes. Then he later says everything is on the table in a vague way. (Seemingly in answer to a different question?)

To my hearing he never says "raise taxes" in the clip, even to say he's against it.

Then the narrator says, "Did he just say raise taxes? Yes he did!"

Then the narrator says, "It gets worse..." without explaining how.

I have always been fascinated by the Big Lie. For some reason the cognitive dissonance of being lied to in an outrageous way ends up being more persuasive than a less obvious lie. The big lie causes the critical thinking centers to shut down in shock or something.

This formula will probably become popular in future campaigns. "Did she just say kill all the babies? Yes she did!"
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deeds himself was useless - said he'd "opt out" of a health care public option.
Another CORPORATE blue-dog.

Yeah, I went and voted for him but I held my nose. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. One positive thing from Deeds run is dems know they can't win running as KKKons
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That they haven't learned this lesson after 20 years is impressive
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think it is about time this stuff is taken to court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
iceman66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-04-09 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What good would that do?
The Reagan/Bush Supreme Court would just rule in favor of the Rethugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC