Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did anybody see this yesterday? Matheson aims to cut public health option

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 02:16 PM
Original message
Did anybody see this yesterday? Matheson aims to cut public health option
Edited on Fri Nov-06-09 02:19 PM by ej510
Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, will ask House leaders Friday to allow a vote that could strip a public insurance option out of the Democrat's health-care bill.

Matheson, chairman of the moderate "Blue Dog" Democratic caucus in the House, on Thursday released a list of five amendments that he plans to ask the Rules Committee to allow during an expected Saturday debate in the House on the reform bill. The most prominent would strip the hotly contested "public option" out of the bill.

"I agree with my colleagues that consumers deserve more choice and competition within the insurance marketplace. However, I disagree that a government-run-insurance option is the only way to achieve this shared goal," Matheson said in a statement prepared for the committee.

Instead of a public option, "I have filed an amendment to create state-based cooperatives — similar to the provisions included in the Senate Finance Committee — as a means of providing families and individuals with another health-insurance option," he said.

That amendment, and the others, may face an uphill battle. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has said that Democrats may reject all amendments to the bill, except one that would restrict federal funds going to abortions.

Among other amendments that Matheson said he intends to seek are:
Matheson aims to cut public health option

By Lee Davidson

Deseret News
Published: Thursday, Nov. 5, 2009 8:55 p.m. MST
16 comments
Facebook Fark Buzz Digg | E-MAIL | PRINT | FONT + -
E-mail story

It's easy. Send a link to the story you were just reading to a friend. Just fill out the form on this page and we'll send it along.

Your name and e-mail address are transmitted to the recipient. Otherwise, it is considered private information; see Privacy policy.

E-mail address of recipient
(Only one address please; multiple addresses are not supported)

Name of recipient

Your e-mail address

Your name

Rep. Jim Matheson, D-Utah, will ask House leaders Friday to allow a vote that could strip a public insurance option out of the Democrat's health-care bill.

Matheson, chairman of the moderate "Blue Dog" Democratic caucus in the House, on Thursday released a list of five amendments that he plans to ask the Rules Committee to allow during an expected Saturday debate in the House on the reform bill. The most prominent would strip the hotly contested "public option" out of the bill.

"I agree with my colleagues that consumers deserve more choice and competition within the insurance marketplace. However, I disagree that a government-run-insurance option is the only way to achieve this shared goal," Matheson said in a statement prepared for the committee.

Instead of a public option, "I have filed an amendment to create state-based cooperatives — similar to the provisions included in the Senate Finance Committee — as a means of providing families and individuals with another health-insurance option," he said.

That amendment, and the others, may face an uphill battle. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has said that Democrats may reject all amendments to the bill, except one that would restrict federal funds going to abortions.

Among other amendments that Matheson said he intends to seek are:
Story continues below

Creating state-based insurance exchanges, instead of a national one. He said that would "offer flexibility and responsiveness to the health-care demographic differences of each state."

Capping non-economic damages in medical malpractice lawsuits to $250,000. He said the Congressional Budget Office has said that could save $54 billion over 10 years.

Allowing health-savings accounts in insurance exchanges.

Allowing loan forgiveness for new pediatricians, designed to address a shortage of such doctors. (Matheson's wife is a pediatrician.)

Matheson voted against an early version of the Democratic health-reform bill in committee and has been pushing to tweak it with similar changes for months.


Moving further to the right.
Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. We should start a campaign to get the media to stop calling blue dogs "moderate"
They should be "conservative" democrats. Or something else, if anyone has a better suggestion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They are republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I've written to Matheson
asking him why in the heck he mislead those that voted for him into thinking he was a Dem. Of course this was related to health care. His repsonse was straight down party lines...Republican party lines. The guy has nothing of his father in him. Another that will be waiting for a re-election that will never come!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. We need the progressives to block the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC