Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Big lies work better

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 10:51 AM
Original message
Big lies work better
Edited on Sat Nov-07-09 11:29 AM by Kurt_and_Hunter
A Republican congressman goes on TV and says "This bill has death panels."

He is likely to be contradicted or asked for proof. (Except on FOX)

A Republican (or, in some cases, Democratic) congressman goes on TV and says "This bill is a government takeover of healthcare."

He will not be contradicted. The statement will be treated as a religious statement beyond polite challenge or rational examination. But it is no less a (false) factual claim. Since it is vague it will take a while to define the terms, like "takeover," but "death panels" isn't self-defining either. It is not just a personal aesthetic opinion; the person is making some sort of claim about real world actions and effects.

"Bankrupt the country" and "take away our freedoms" are claims not mere opinions.

When someone predicates their specific comments on a gigantic over-arching lie we (humans) tend to focus on the specifics, but its the biggest lies that color the whole debate.

For instance:

"Since terrorism is the greatest threat we face as a nation torture should be used to elicit intelligence."

That will lead to a specific debate about the morality or efficacy of torture, skipping right by the even more outlandish--and easily challenged--claim that terrorism is the greatest threat we face.

Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. I hear ya. Just once will someone challenge these people on the meaning of the word "socialism"?
Thats the one that pisses me off the most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder why that is, what is the rhetorical logic at work here?
Has anyone in the MSM ever seriously challenged the Obama = Hitler meme, for example, among the many absurd claims made by the right? Or Jonah Goldberg's belief that Nazism is the origin of modern American liberalism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. To challenge a truly Big Lie requires recreating the entirety of logic
Edited on Sat Nov-07-09 11:06 AM by Kurt_and_Hunter
Someone says 2+2=5. You point out that it is 4. They insist it is 5.

Now where are you?

How do you refute that without recapitulating the entirety of mathematics? Seeking consensus on whether the word five means IIII or IIIII... establishing what "+' and "=" mean...

The big lie leap-frogs debate.

It is a form of aggression and/or religion and/or hypnotism disguised as debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Or simply the guts and honesty to say: "That is false." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC