|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:19 PM Original message |
The so-called healthcare "reform bill" becomes a right-wing anti-abortion bill. |
Refresh | 0 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
stray cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
1. Are insurance companies currently obligated to pay for abortions without restriction now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Insurance companies may pay for abortions but now won't be allowed to under this amendment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Some states have laws restricting the coverage of abortions by private insurance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Garam_Masala (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 04:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
16. Insurance now pays for any abortion necessary for medical reasons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Kurt_and_Hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 04:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
18. They are not currently PENALIZED for offering coverage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:21 PM Response to Original message |
2. Who are the 64 women hating Democrats? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
5. Why?! Why?! Why do you continue to ALWAYS be disingenuous?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:39 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Why, why, why do you constantly use the word disingenuous?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:41 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I would use "lie" but I don't think that's allowed. I could use "exagerate." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:42 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Disingenuous is a very good word. Narrative is not similar at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Better Believe It (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 11:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. I apologize for my lack of a college education. But I'm learning new, big words and .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 10:45 PM Response to Original message |
9. The saddest aspect of this bill is that if the Dems did this to get more Rep votes, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 11:14 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. They got.....1. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 11:34 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. The dude from LA; Jefferson's old district. He knows better. He represents a majority of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Orangepeel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 11:42 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. no, they did it to get more Democratic votes. There are anti-choicers in the party. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Liberal_Stalwart71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:04 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. I'm well aware of that. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 04:18 PM Response to Original message |
15. Then why didn't the repukes all vote for it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Garam_Masala (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 04:25 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. New taxes ($$$$$ = Money) outranks prinicples (pro-life) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Aramchek (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
19. quite a steaming cup o' FAIL you brewed there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
budkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
20. Wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 02:58 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC