|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 11:15 PM Original message |
Joseph Cao (R) makes it bi-partisan! |
Refresh | +18 Recommendations | Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
provis99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 11:17 PM Response to Original message |
1. who? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 11:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. LA's 2nd congressional district. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DRoseDARs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 11:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. Well, it isn't Her Royal Majesty High Priestess Madame President Queen of the Hill Snowe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Blue-Jay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 11:33 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Snowe is in the Senate, not the House. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
fugop (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
3. Awesome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
4. His House page: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
adamuu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:36 AM Response to Reply #4 |
19. Hmm is this part of the reason for the anti-choice amendment? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:47 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. well, not him alone - it would have passed w/o him and I doubt Pelosi was counting on him. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
adamuu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:53 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. But Obama really wanted it to be "bipartisan" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:56 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. true. I bet we'll be hearing more about the backstory soon! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 07:16 AM Response to Reply #19 |
36. No, sadly that was to keep horrid blue dogs from killing the damn thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
global1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
5. His D.C. Office Telephone Number Is...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 11:30 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. "Joseph Cao lost both his home and law office to Katrina." !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
ChicagoSuz219 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:23 AM Response to Reply #5 |
17. Just called the N'Awlins office-MAILBOX IS FULL!!... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
6. "I have always said that I would put aside partisan wrangling to do the business of the people." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 11:30 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I think he pretty much had to vote for this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
The Magistrate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 11:34 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. He has The Un-Lamented Mr. Jefferson's District, does He Not, My Friend? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
mvd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 11:35 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. You are correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 11:49 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. He will also have every mongrel Teabagger descending upon him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:38 AM Response to Reply #15 |
28. Cao voted for it because he wants to survive in a district |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
The Magistrate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 02:35 PM Response to Reply #15 |
37. They Would Be In Seriously Hostile Territory, Sir.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
KingFlorez (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
13. One is better than None |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
RepublicanElephant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-07-09 11:38 PM Response to Original message |
14. he a repub because he thinks it's the "christian party", but he needs to switch-over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
16. dems should repeatedly call it the "bipartisan health reform bill" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Pirate Smile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:38 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Luv it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:00 AM Response to Reply #16 |
27. They did that in a press conference... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:25 AM Response to Original message |
18. I am proud to have started the particular migration plan (The Orderly Departure Program) that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:38 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. And I thank you for your service! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Muttocracy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:47 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. wow! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
yurbud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 12:55 AM Response to Original message |
25. whatever the merits of this particular guy, the mere mention of bipartisanship makes me want to barf |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 01:40 AM Response to Reply #25 |
29. He most likely voted for it because he is in a Dem district. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Abq_Sarah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 02:55 AM Response to Original message |
30. That's actually not what bi-partisan means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 03:45 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Both parties agreed on much of the bill. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Loudmxr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 03:21 AM Response to Original message |
31. Cao is going to be drummed out of the Rethug party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
boppers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 05:52 AM Response to Reply #31 |
35. He's a minority (R). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 03:24 AM Response to Original message |
32. If I was Cao I would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
joeycola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 04:20 AM Response to Original message |
34. ha ha!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-08-09 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
38. It's Lousiana for fucks sake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 03:07 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC