Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama will send tens of thousands more troops to Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:17 PM
Original message
Obama will send tens of thousands more troops to Afghanistan
You do realize that the only issue here is the level of war escalation, don't you? Obama put the "cut bait" peace option off the table months ago. A lost opportunity to save American and Afghan lives!

Obama will send tens of thousands more troops to Afghanistan

By Patrick Martin
9 November 2009

According to US press reports Sunday, President Barack Obama has decided to send tens of thousands of additional US troops to Afghanistan in an attempt to suppress growing popular resistance to foreign occupation.

The New York Times reported Sunday on its web site that the White House had narrowed its options in Afghanistan to three—all involving troop increases of 20,000, 30,000 and 40,000 respectively. The plans for escalating the war have come in response to the urgent request by General Stanley McChrystal, the US commander in Afghanistan.

Citing “administration and military officials,” McClatchy Newspapers reported Saturday night that Obama has already settled on 34,000 troops, but was waiting to announce it until after briefing the other governments participating in the NATO occupation and completing a trip to Asia, now set for November 11-19.

McClatchy identified the new military units to be deployed in Afghanistan as including three Army brigades from the 101st Airborne Division, based at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, and the 10th Mountain Division, at Fort Drum, New York, and a Marine brigade. These forces, comprising 23,000 soldiers, would serve in combat and support roles. Another 7,000 troops would establish a new division headquarters in Kandahar, where the US is to take command of all NATO and allied forces in a Regional Command (South). Another 4,000 military trainers would likely be sent as well. The details could still change, officials told McClatchy, and would not be finalized until a NATO meeting November 23.

Two top military officers indirectly confirmed the escalation of the war in Afghanistan. Admiral Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told a Washington audience Wednesday that the administration would request a supplemental funding bill to meet the cost of the additional troops, with Pentagon officials giving a ballpark estimate of $50 billion. The regular Pentagon appropriations bill, signed by Obama at the end of last month, already allots $130 billion to military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

General George Casey, the Army chief of staff, called for sending more troops to Afghanistan in the course of a series of interviews on Sunday morning television talk shows. He was brought on to the programs to respond to questions about the killing of 13 soldiers at Fort Hood, Texas by an Army major apparently upset over an impending deployment to the Afghanistan war.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/nov2009/aftr-n09.shtml
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Seems this prez takes all the right moves off the table - WTF! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gibbs and the WH have denied this.
Hear those war drums?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The only decision pending is the level of violence that Obama will unleash on the Afghan people
This is not a situation in which Obama is vacillating between war and peace. He already chose war!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. THey don't give a shit..they want blood and
by gawd they're gonna have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Looks like it's the prez who wants blood - we want peace. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. The president hasn't made a decision yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. He decided in favor of war! He put the peace option off the table.
Obama is only deciding between the level of savagery he is willing to unleash on Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Funny how you never bring up how he's drawing down troops in Iraq at an unprecedented pace.
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 08:43 PM by ClarkUSA
So he's put the peace option back on the table! :woohoo:


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. It's all about making
the whine more bitter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. ROFL
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. And they are being redeployed to Afghanistan
and the Iraq drawdown is not at an unprecedented pace, but at a snail's pace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yay! The peace option is on the table in Iraq!!
:woohoo:

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Keep the mediawhore LIES coming so you
can get all the little bitty whiners raging ON and ON and ON.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Obama is deciding one thing and one thing only: the level of war!
Obama decided months ago that he was going to wage war. The only issue pending is the level of violence that he will unleash on the Afghan people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. MEDIAWHORE LIES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. I certainly think the progressives need to get clearer on this.
The war against Afghanistan - the occupation of subjugation of that country - is criminal and immmoral. People should be pointed and clear on the matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. Debunking this mediawhore OP --> "Obama has not announced a plan for Afghanistan" (link)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC