Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

3 Top Obama Advisers Favor Adding Troops in Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 12:34 PM
Original message
3 Top Obama Advisers Favor Adding Troops in Afghanistan
3 Top Obama Advisers Favor Adding Troops in Afghanistan

By ELISABETH BUMILLER and DAVID E. SANGER
Published: November 10, 2009


WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton are coalescing around a proposal to send 30,000 or more additional American troops to Afghanistan, but President Obama remains unsatisfied with answers he has gotten about how vigorously the governments of Afghanistan and Pakistan would help execute a new strategy, administration officials said Tuesday.

Mr. Obama is to consider four final options in a meeting with his national security team on Wednesday, his press secretary, Robert Gibbs, told reporters. The options outline different troop levels, other officials said, but they also assume different goals — including how much of Afghanistan the troops would seek to control — and different time frames and expectations for the training of Afghan security forces.

Three of the options call for specific levels of additional troops. The low-end option would add 20,000 to 25,000 troops, a middle option calls for about 30,000, and another embraces Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal’s request for roughly 40,000 more troops. Administration officials said that a fourth option was added only in the past few days. They declined to identify any troop level attached to it.

Mr. Gates, a Republican who served as President George W. Bush’s last defense secretary, and who commands considerable respect from the president, is expected to be pivotal in Mr. Obama’s decision. But administration officials cautioned that Mr. Obama had not yet made up his mind, and that other top advisers, among them Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and the White House chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, remained skeptical of the value of a buildup.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/11/world/asia/11policy.html?_r=3&ref=politics
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. from whom do you think he should take his advice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I hope the 'get out while you can' option was put back on the table
Biden is reported to be advocating reducing the footprint and relying on Predator strikes. The problem with Biden's proposal is that the Predator strikes have killed hundreds of innocent people, and have turned people in Afghanistan and Pakistan against us. Even the narco criminal Karzai was forced to complain to the US about Predators killing innocent civilians.

The best thing Obama can do, other than an outright pullout, is to change the mission and begin the withdrawal of all of our troops in Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. If Obama left Americans would be elated he has the nations support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. He should take his advice from Veterans for Peace and military families
Edited on Wed Nov-11-09 01:14 PM by Better Believe It
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I would prefer Kerry and Reed
(That should come as no surprise)

I think Kerry made very good cases for why just a counterterrorism effort will fail and for why the McChrystal plan doesn't have the civilian Afghan support needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC