Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama urged to turn successful state job program national

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:21 AM
Original message
Obama urged to turn successful state job program national
Obama urged to turn successful state job program national

By Tony Pugh | McClatchy Newspapers


WASHINGTON — As job losses continue to slow the nation's economic recovery, labor experts and economists are urging Congress and the Obama administration to boost funding for a little-known program that 17 states are using to avert layoffs and keep workers in their jobs.

Mass layoffs of 50 or more employees claimed 278,000 jobs in the third quarter alone, according to new government data. All the laid-off workers were idled for at least a month and only one-third of their employers expected any of them to be recalled.

In the face of continuing business slowdowns, however, thousands of employers are forgoing layoffs and taking advantage of state "work-sharing" programs in which they cut the hours of full-time workers, who then recoup a portion of their lost wages — usually 50 to 60 percent — from unemployment insurance benefits.

The rules vary by state, but work sharing typically helps reimburse employees for wage reductions ranging from 10 to 60 percent.

For example, an employer that needs to cut 20 percent of its full-time work force could do so through layoffs. If those laid-off workers earned an average of $500 a week, they probably could expect roughly $250 a week in unemployment benefits.

However, if instead of layoffs those workers' hours were cut by 20 percent through the work-sharing program, they'd each earn $400 a week. They'd also be eligible for the program's jobless benefits, which would make up about half of that $100 wage cut, or $50. With this approach, the worker's earnings would be roughly $450 a week, a 10 percent cut instead of a 50 percent cut.

Employees like the program, which is sometimes called "short-time compensation," because the wage reductions are absorbed equally among workers, avoiding the stress and income loss of layoffs. Employers like it because they can reduce payroll and retain experienced workers and don't have to pay to recruit, hire and train new workers when the economy improves.

more...

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/78720.html
Refresh | +8 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. That sounds like a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is an excellent idea, we'll see were it goes...corporate America doesn't new stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. Canada has been doing this for some time
I was wondering why the US wasn't, but, well, I guess some have! Its a decent idea because it maintain production levels at the same cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. Florida's employers really need to expand their use of this seemingly excellent program.
Work-sharing programs are available in Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Florida, Iowa, Kansas, New York state, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Oregon, Rhode Island, Texas, Vermont and Washington state. Their popularity has skyrocketed since the economy tanked in December 2007.

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/78720.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
optimator Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. the business criminals advising him won't allow it
that is socialist commie stuff (in their view)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Actually this is good for business too
Businesses basically get their employees' salaries subsidized by the government instead of having to make layoffs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Actually this is good for business too
Businesses basically get their employees' salaries subsidized by the government instead of having to make layoffs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
PopSixSquish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Oh, I Think President Obama has Indicated His Ability to Make Up His Own Damn Mind Many Times
including yesterday's news on Afghanistran. How about you give the man a slight break and see what happens?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Dude...don't piss on their, "he's corporatist, warmonger, homophobe, take your pick" rant...
It keeps them happy. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC