Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Get the word out about PROVISIONAL BALLOTS!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
funkybutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:05 AM
Original message
Get the word out about PROVISIONAL BALLOTS!
http://www.electionline.org/site/dav/html/brief1b.html


Provisional Balloting

Beginning January 1, 2004, all states must provide provisional ballots to “persons who claim to be registered to vote in a federal election in a jurisdiction but are not on the official list of registered voters or are otherwise ineligible.”6 Additionally, the ballot must be counted, if deemed valid according to state law, and the voter must “be able to ascertain whether the ballot was counted (and if not, why not) through a free-access system and be informed of that option when the ballot is cast.”7

The seven states that use either an election-day registration system or no voter registration system – Idaho, Maine, Minnesota, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Wisconsin and Wyoming – are exempt from these requirements.8

As of February 2003, officials from only seven of the 43 non-exempt states and the District of Columbia said they believe that their current procedures are in compliance with this section of the new law. Pennsylvania waited until the passage of the Act last fall before it enacted provisional balloting rules, ensuring that it would be in compliance. Six other states – Hawaii, Indiana, Kansas, New York, Oregon and West Virginia – and the District of Columbia say the procedures that they used before last fall are compliant.

Of the 36 states that indicated they are not currently in compliance, this survey found that some states are closer than others to meeting the requirements. For example, Washington State, along with a number of other states, offers provisional balloting but must establish a free-access mechanism for voters to check the status of their ballots. State officials plan to accomplish this through a directive rather than through legislation.

Similarly, Utah instituted provisional voting in the 2002 elections, but according to the state’s election director Amy Naccarato, “we will need to make some changes to the process to include a Web site where voters can see if their ballot was counted or not.”9 She expects the legislature to address that missing element in this year’s session.

Other states have no prior experience with issuing and counting provisional ballots and must enact significant legislation to meet the bill’s mandates. Already this year, the South Dakota legislature, with the backing of election officials, enacted legislation which would create a provisional balloting system to comply with the Act.10 Several states have yet to introduce bills in this year’s sessions to address this area of the federal law, including Illinois – where the legislature failed to pass a provisional voting bill in 2002.

With the deadline for meeting this requirement coming in just ten months, this Briefing finds that a flurry of state legislation and administrative rules pertaining to provisional balloting has already begun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent point
I was going to post on this but I am glad you did. I made sure that everyone I talked to (including the gate guard) knew about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lefthandedskyhook Donating Member (340 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Still not a cure-all
Provisional ballots are a good thing as long as the voter information checks out. If there is any glitch (usually caused by voting in the wrong location) the ballot will not be counted. In some districts the majority of provisional ballots are rejected for not meeting all requirements. People need to be informed of their correct polling location before election day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funkybutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. good point
So the "correct polling place" would be relative to their current address or the current registration that's on the books. what if their registration has expired or if they've been purged for being "inactive"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ISUGRADIA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. In Iowa, at least, if the person is not currently registered
the provisional ballot would not count
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostalgicaboutmyfutr Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-04 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Colorado Disenfranchizing voters
In Colorado the SoS has deemed that when someone votes using a provisional ballot...the only vote that will be counted will be the one for president.....

All Senate, congress, propotions/amendments etc.....WILL BE IGNORED!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC