Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Next time they say Kerry is bad for American security . . .

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:53 AM
Original message
Next time they say Kerry is bad for American security . . .
. . . say 9/11, the worst attack in this country's history, happened on Bush's watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. But that's when the give you ten reasons...
...it's Clenis's fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Clinton isn't running
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IdaBriggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I've been pointing out * dismantled our anti-terror systems in Feb 01
and didn't put anything else in place until Sep 12 when he put the "old systems" back in place which is why we haven't been hit since. I got this information (thanks to the folks in the 9/11 forum) from the CRS Report for Congress on "Terrorism and the Military's Role in Domestic Crisis Management" dated April 19, 2001 (http://www.fas.org/irp/crs/RL30938.pdf) which states in part on page 6:

“President George W. Bush recently signed National Security Presidential Directive-1 (NSPD-1) establishing the organization of the National Security Council under his Administration. Among other things, the document abolishes the previous system of interagency working groups and replaces them with policy coordination committees (PCC).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. Who lied to start a losing war?
This isn't exactly their strong point. They get confused. They think making defense contractors rich while exhausting the budget and military manpower means they're strong on defense.

Similarly, making the energy industry rich by obstructing markets with Enron schemes and war, is called an energy policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. and i've a cousin who has the gall to tell me that,
"I do agree that Clinton put money in people's pocket and then, what?
Six months after his eight years in office we have the biggest attack on the U.S. ever" ... and with that she totally discounts the six months GWB has spent running the country prior to 9/11, being told by Clinton as he exited that OBL was the biggest danger/threat to our country, discounting Clinton's advise (or willfully not paying attention), again discounting the daily presidential briefings warning him of a plan attacked by OBL inside the U.S. (Or again willfully not paying attention to the daily presidential briefings)and just simply not doing his job...
For my cousin and many others like my cousin, IT IS ALL CLINTON'S FAULT! it is unbelievable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC