Something that BamaLefty mentioned in another thread, reminded me of a column I read in the Birmingham Post-Herald a week or two ago. It was about a speech that George Wallace had intended to give after his election in 1961. For some reason, he decided to not go through with it. I wonder how history might have been different if he had given that speech.
"I just left George's office, and he showed me the inaugural speech," said Pete, "After all that racist talk in the campaign, he's now talking about all of us working together, black and white."
*snip*
I sat there, stunned. It was the biggest scoop of my young newspaper life. George Wallace, after a bitter racist campaign, now calling for amelioration, cooperation between the races.
*snip*
We were right. The next morning, in the cold January air, after the high school bands had tootled and boomed their way past the speaker's platform, Wallace took the racist road. He discarded the speech Pete had seen, drew a line in the dust, and threw down his challenge to the nation: "Segregation today, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever."
*snip*
It is interesting to speculate what would have happened if Wallace had come down the other way. In his earlier life, he was no racist, proposing programs that would help poor people and blacks. In his courtroom in Barbour County, when a corporation lawyer called a black lawyer by his first name, Wallace reprimanded him, and ordered him to call the black lawyer by his last name.
http://www.postherald.com/co041505.shtml(About a third down the page.)
EDIT: Wallace first became governor in 1963, not 1961.